High quality growth compounder currently trades at/near 10-year relative low valn; secular and competitive concerns likely overblown; high quality oligopoly drives extremely attractive economics
Business has durable long-term tailwinds
Long-term trend away from cash (cash + check) usage
Cash/check usage 40% in 2015 → 25% currently; trend expected to continue
Move to online shopping an important driver of trend towards cashless
V has garnered consistent gains in global consumer payments market share: 15.3% (2017) → 17.0% 2021
Credit card industry is a solid oligopoly which lends itself to defensible industry pricing: global credit card market shares (top 4) by purchase transactions: Visa 50%, Mastercard 26%, UnionPay (Chinese) 20%, AmEx 3%
Move from cash → cashless
Market share
These trends have driven consistent double digit payment volume CAGRs for Visa over the medium-term; volumes slowed during COVID but are now reaccelerating
Return of cross-border transaction provides additional near-to-medium term tailwind
International transaction revs as % of total gross revs: 2019 27%, 2020 20%, 2021 20%
Current management guidance for fiscal 2022 that cross-border transactions return to 80-85% of 2019 levels, with full recovery by summer 2023
Cross-border transactions are meaningfully more profitable than domestic transactions; estimate that cross-borders fee/transaction is 9x vs domestic
COVID meaningfully reduced cross-border transaction volume; this has been returning slowly
Market currently has multiple structural concerns, many/most of which appear overblown
BNPL is growing rapidly, and market is largely viewing it a threat to the payment networks as it can theoretically be used to route payments outside the networks (direct debit to bank account using ACH)
However, BNPL currently represents more of an opportunity than a threat
Average BNPL transaction is 37% higher than average non-BNPL transaction, so net $ flow over payment network for average BNPL transaction modestly above that of average non-BNPL transaction (i.e., 137% of 75% = 103%)
V/MA are powering the BNPL’s virtual card product; V/MA issue what are effectively 1-time card numbers for transactions done through BNPL providers’ websites
V/MA are providing white label solutions for BNPL providers
75% of BNPL payments currently flow over the payment networks; roughly 45% via debit and 30% via credit
Payment network fees are combination of fixed fee + variable % of transaction value; with typical BNPL transaction generating 4 monthly payments, fixed fee portion of payment network take is 4x that of a non-BNPL transaction
Other BNPL revenue streams
ACH transactions (direct bank-to-bank transfers) can move payments outside the existing payment networks, posing a threat to payment network volumes
Reality is that ACH functionality has existed for years, but has not meaningfully slowed payment network volume growth
Payment networks provide important security features/guarantees, standing between consumers and payment recipients; fraud protection for consumers; many consumers are understandably loath to provide bank account information directly to payment recipients
While economics for retailers and service providers are preferable for ACH, it is questionable whether the economic incentive outweighs the convenience of using the well-established (and consumer friendly) existing payment networks
As an example, PayPal tried aggressively to incent consumers to move to ACH payments versus payment networks a number of years back but ultimately backed off; associated savings was insufficient to drive consumer demand
Volatility of crypto pricing makes it a relatively undesirable medium of exchange
Current estimate that 9% of businesses accept crypto for payment (statistic undocumented)
Transaction costs for crypto are high…often orders of magnitude above existing payments networks; moreover, a portion of the transaction expenses for crypto are explicitly borne by the consumer (as opposed to generally being hidden from consumers for payment network transactions)
Threat of other new technologies is always present; reality is that the overwhelming majority of these technologies end up being built on top of the existing payment network infrastructure; good example are digital wallets (Google Pay, Apple Pay)
Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL)
ACH
Crypto
Other new technologies
Fee pressure
Amazon UK recently stated publicly that it would stop accepting Visa credit cards in the UK (early 2022) due to unreasonably high fees; moreover, it indicated an intention to move its co-branded credit cards away from Visa to a competitor
This is likely a public negotiating posture; similar public pronouncements have been made in the past by Kroger and Walmart, both of which were resolved in a mutually acceptable fashion
Proposed ban applies only to Visa credit, not Visa debit; debit is much more prevalent in the UK, with Visa debit accounting for 3x the volume of Visa credit
Assuming worst case scenario: 1) co-branded Amazon cards currently represent just 0.04% of total V volumes, ii) assuming the dispute moved to NA, with 30-40% of NA volumes moving thru Visa networks, total exposure is ~1% of overall V volumes
Legal exposure
Oligopolistic nature of industry constantly attracts regulatory scrutiny across geographies
Visa received Civil Investigative Demand in Mar 2021 from DOJ; relates to Visa limitations on merchant customer’s ability to route debit transactions over PIN-based networks, which are typically cheaper (from merchant standpoint) than Visa’s signature-based network
Reports indicate that DOJ investigation may extend to incorporate Visa relationship with fintech companies
Worst case scenario (per UBS) of 5% EPS hit
Attractive economics
Oligopolistic nature of industry drives extraordinary economics
70% EBITDA margins
20%+ ROICs, 30%+ ROEs
Negative working capital cycle
Extremely consistent earnings growth algorithm; company delivers at or above consensus expectations like clockwork
Valuation
P/E: 1.3x S&P
EV/EBITDA: 1.55x S&P
Company currently trading at/near 10-year relative valn lows
Business
Global payment solutions provider
Gross revenue breakdown
Data Processing Revenues (39% of total) – authorization, clearing, settlement, value-added services, network access, maintenance and support services
Service Revenues (35% of total) – services provided in support of client usage of Visa payment services
International Transaction Revenues (20% of total) – cross-border transaction processing and currency conversion activities
Other Revenues (5% of total) – license fees for use of Visa brand or technology, fees for account holders’ services, certification, and licensing
Upside/Downside
Value accretion/compounding analysis
~17% annual accretion from combination of rev growth (12.5%) + very modest margin expansion + FCF accretion
Addl 24% upside from multiple expansion back to historical levels (5-yr average multiple relative to S&P 500 ~1.9x S&P 500 EV/EBITDA mult)
Yields 2-yr return of ~70%
Blended P/E and EV/EBITDA target multiple approach on 2024 fiscal yields similar upside assuming return to average relative multiples
Solid downside protection @ 1.1x S&P 500 relative multiple; much higher quality business (better growth prospects, far superior ROIC/ROEs, better margins)
Risks
AmEx likely to regain some lost market share in the near-term as travel and entertainment spending rebounds post-COVID
Omicron impact on cross-border volumes
Regulatory overhang
Secular threats (crypto, alternate technologies) prove more competitive than expected
Macro exposure; consumer weakness
I do not hold a position with the issuer such as employment, directorship, or consultancy. I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.
Catalyst
Return of normalized levels of cross-border transactions; continued LDD volume growth negates concerns over BNPL, crypto, etc.; regulatory overhang abates
Are you sure you want to close this position Visa Inc.?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Flag Visa Inc. for Removal
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea Visa Inc. for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You Cannot Submit Message ... Yet
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are
1 way you can get the privilage.
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.