Description
I believe GTI, a graphite electrode supplier to the steel industry, is a short because:
- World Steel Association estimates the utilization of global steel capacity in 2012 was 78%, suggesting overcapacity.
- World Steel Association says steel demand grew by ~1% in 2012; I do not expect this demand growth to accelerate as I do not see China’s demand for steel accelerating and do not believe rest of world will pick up the slack.
- GTI’s industrial segment, which supplies the steel industry with graphite electrodes, has generated ~90% of GTI’s total EBIT in each of the last 3 years (rest of EBIT was Engineered Solutions)
- I estimate GTI normalized EPS of ~$0.30 and believe it should trade near 10x EPS when GTI's utilization is at least 70%
- GTI states the graphite electrode industry was at 73% utilization in 2012 and that competition “has exacerbated a challenging global graphite electrode industry, which already had excess capacity.” (4q12 results news release, under Outlook)
- Between 2008 and 2012, GTI’s utilization has changed faster than the industry (both in the downside and recovery), suggesting it is a high-cost producer
Regarding #1 and #2:
If global steel demand growth is 2-3%, I believe GTI still falls 14%.
My reasoning:
With 2-3% steel demand growth over 2-3 years, perhaps GTI utilization can return to the 82% utilization it realized in 2011, during which GTI reported $249MM in EBITDA.
At such EBITDA, I estimate normalized D&A of $105MM and interest expense of $35MM, implying EBT of $109MM.
Using a normalized tax rate of 33% yields GAAP earnings of $73MM, or EPS of $0.54.
Over the last 5 years, the forward twelve month p/e has been 12x. Using such p/e on my estimate of $0.54 implies a share price near $6.50 and hence the 14% downside.
If demand does not improve, however, and GTI utilization stays near 70%, I see normalized EBITDA near $200MM and EPS of $0.30 (using same expenses above). In fact, I believe 2013 EBITDA will be below $200MM. Note 1Q13 EBITDA mid-point guidance of $35MM is due to the high cost inventory GTI produced at 65% utilization in 2H12 that will be delivered in 1Q13. Given such high cost inventory will also be delivered in 2Q13, I suspect $200MM in 2013 EBITDA will be difficult to achieve if utilization stays near 70% for 2013.
If utilization falls to the mid 60% level seen in 2H12, GTI's EPS will be near zero:
In 2009, when graphite electrode industry operated at 60% utilization, GTI EBITDA was $131MM. Now in 2009, GTI only owned 18% of Seadrift, which it now owns fully. Seadrift in 2009, however, generated negative $2.7MM in equity earnings (they owned 19% of Seadrift in 2009). Even if you assume Seadrift added $40MM in annual D&A (the difference in GTI D&A between 2011 and 2010; GTI acquired Seadrift in November 2010), you get pro-forma EBITDA near $160MM.
Subtracting 2013 interest expense and normalized D&A yields EBT of $20MM and negligible EPS.
I do not hold a position of employment, directorship, or consultancy with the issuer.
Neither I nor others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.
Catalyst
1q13 and 2q13 results should cause downward revision in concensus 2013 EBITDA and increase skepticism that GTI EBITDA will recover to $235MM in 2014 and $300MM in 2015 without a greater than expected acceleration in global steel demand.