Frequency Electronics FEIM
December 30, 2008 - 4:12pm EST by
coda516
2008 2009
Price: 2.65 EPS
Shares Out. (in M): 0 P/E
Market Cap (in $M): 21 P/FCF
Net Debt (in $M): 0 EBIT 0 0
TEV (in $M): 0 TEV/EBIT

Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.

Description

Frequency Electronics is a classic net/net that does not lose money and is trading at ~2.5x EV to a level of EBIT that we consider the minimum of what such a good business would earn in a normal environment (not a boom environment, a normal environment). Following will be a description of this business, a short explanation of what we think it should be able to earn in the next 3 years, and a simple illustration of the fact that you're now paying a 25% discount to an already severely conservative estimate of NCAV.
 
FEI's Businesses
 
FEI specializes in the niche of mission critical frequency control. In English, that means that it develops, manufactures, and sells timing and synchronization equipment for complex machines such as satellites, missiles, and telecom base stations. Basically, anything that works on the basis of signals needs components that accurately keeps track of time; otherwise, the device either won't work or won't work as expected. FEI specializes in the most complex types of timing and frequency controls. These can be divided into the following categories (I use FY 2009 numbers here because they will be significantly lower than 2008):
  • Satellite payloads - the accuracy needed for timing devices in satellites is literally orders of magnitude more than the typical accuracy of, say, a desktop computer (a satellite master clock, for example, can be off by about a second for every 30,000 years while a desktop computer clock, as we all know, can be off by a couple of seconds per day). The nice thing about this division is that it really has no competitors except for the in-house tech departments of the satellite companies themselves. For FY 2009, which ends 4/30/2009, FEI will probably do ~$20M in revenue in this segment, down from over $30M in FY 2008 due to commercial satellite orders simply not being booked in light of this recession.
  • US Gov't/DOD non-satellite programs - these include missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and other military necessities. Here too, the accuracy necessary is significantly more than mass produced computing devices. Here too, the only competitors are the in house departments of the defense companies. In fact, the newest technology that Frequency is testing in this segment (low-g sensitivity) has no competitors at all (even in-house), which is why FEI has been winning significant contracts here recently. For FY 2009, FEI will probably do ~$10M in revenue for this segment, which will actually be flat to up a bit from FY 2008.
  • Telecom infrastructure - whether it's wireless or wireline, data or voice, telecom infrastructure is run on signals and signal generation and capture must be synchronized accurately. Here, FEI has a larger competitor in Symmetricom (SYMM), but FEI's new technology here should give it a decent advantage in capturing market share in the near and intermediate term. The bigger deal here is that on almost all fronts, telecom networks are in massive need of infrastructure upgrades and in one way or another, FEI will be a large beneficiary of this upgrade. For FY 2009, this segment should generate ~$25M in revenue.
Valuation
 
Of course, the major reason the stock is at $2.60 is because of the massive liquidations everybody has witnessed in the small cap space. The emergence of a large number of net/nets and companies trading at 3x FCF has been widely documented (yet, I guess nobody is willing to bet in size on these companies). But FEI has made its share of mistakes, and that's the reason you see TTM EBITDA as negative. 
 
The biggest issue FEI has had is with gross margins. Anybody doing a few days' work on FEI realizes that the major question facing this company in the future is: what will gross margins be on the satellite payload and gov't/DOD segments? I estimate that gross margins in the telecom infrastructure space are at about 40%, but GMs for the rest of the company are below 30%. To understand why, we have to go through the history of the satellite payload and gov't/DOD businesses.
 
Historically, FEI's business was solely the clocks that go on board a satellite (~$500K/satellite). Starting at the end of FY 2007, FEI started to get into the frequency generators and synthesizers that also went on board a satellite - this is an additional $7M in product that goes into each satellite that FEI figured it had the ability to serve. FEI had always supplied these products on a one-off basis, but the decision to get into the business of mass producing these things required a rapid and radical upgrade to the company's manufacturing infrastructure. Suffice it to say that for the first year, this restructuring of the company's manufacturing capabilities did not go so well and gross margins for the company as a whole tanked. At the same time, SG&A and R&D were increasing in order to build up the company's capability in these products. On the bright side, FEI's vision was at least vindicated as sales for the satellite payload segment grew rapidly in FY 2008.
 
The original contracts FEI won that caused gross margins to tank have now been completed, and management expects gross margins for the company as a whole over the rest of the year to be in the mid-30's range. That would be equivalent to ~5% operating margins on a company-wide basis. That's still a fairly weak showing, and it's probably fair given that a bunch of commercial satellite projects have been delayed due to the economic backdrop. Management expects that at a higher level of sales in the satellite payload arena, attainable once the commercial satellite market reaches some level of normalcy (and I expect that commercial satellite launches will bounce back once the fear recedes - we're not talking about products bought by over-leveraged consumers that are never going to get to use their houses as ATMs again). At that higher level of sales, we expect gross margins to reach the 40% level and operating margins to reach the 10% range. On sales of ~$65M, that would result in ~$6.5M in EBIT. At an EV of $15M, you're now paying ~2.5x that amount.
 
NCAV and Liquidation Value
 
Aside from paying a solid 2.5x EV/EBIT, an investment in FEIM is quite well protected on the downside by asset value. The latest balance sheet shows $13.3M in cash, $17.8M in receivables, $29.5M in inventory, and $6.2M in other current assets. Give full value to the cash, discount the receivables and inventory by 25% (mostly gov't receivables which the gov't is obviously good for, and inventory that would have substantial value to FEI's defense and telecom customers), and give 0 value to other current assets, and you get$49M. Subtract the $22M in total liabilities, and you get $27M compared to a $20M market cap at present.
 
Liquidation value should be even higher for Frequency. It has $8.6M in PP&E, a $7.6M life insurance policy on one of its officers, and investments and loans receivable on the books for ~$3M. Even if you discount the PP&E and investments by 50%, you're looking at a liquidation value of $40M, which is about double today's stock price.
 
Risks & Free Options
 
I would say the biggest risk to this story is management blowing the strong balance sheet on a stupid acquisition. It's not likely with the present frustrated shareholder base, but anything is possible with a management team that is more engineering than finance. The smaller risk here is screwing up on the manufacturing side and not getting to solid level of gross margins. In this latter scenario, I can't see much downside to the stock given where it's trading, but I would think there's still a decent number of holders who may just get fed up with management and liquidate their holdings causing the price to tumble.
 
On the other hand, Frequency also presents several intriguing free options:
  • Increased outsourcing among the satellite manufacturers - this has been a trend in recent years and FEI management sees it intensifying. Given the Frequency doesn't really have much competition in the satellite payload arena, this could mean an extra $7M in revenue for every satellite manufactured that uses Frequency parts. At present, the vast majority (over 80%) of satellite frequency generators and synthesizers are manufactured by the satellite companies in-house.
  • Low-g success. At present, Frequency's gov't/DOD segment doesn't generate much in revenues but does have a technology that offers a 100-fold improvement in accuracy for guidance and targeting systems. The technology can't be mass produced yet but seems to be enjoying significant success in early testing by the military. Significantly - no one out there has anything that comes close to FEI's technology here and management is extremely confident in the defensibility of the IP. This technology would go into missiles, aircraft, and - potentially the most exciting - UAVs, which are a growth business for the armed forces.
  • Moving further up the ladder of addressable satellite payloads. There's about $20-25M in timing and synchronization equipment that goes into a typical commercial satellite. At present, FEI can address ~$7-8M, but it's working on frequency converters and receivers that would make up the rest of the addressable payload. Success in expanding the company's capabilities in satellite payload (profitably, of course) would be a massive value driver.
(I'd just like to apologize for the formatting - I tried to do this on the VIC site, but it still wouldn't let me put in the bullet points etc. - I'm sure the reader could figure it out. And I'd like to apologize for the late December midnight filing, so to speak.)

Catalyst

Gross margins and operating profitability generating positive momentum over the next 2 quarters
    show   sort by    
      Back to top