AIMIA INC AIM.
April 02, 2019 - 9:03am EST by
MadDog2020
2019 2020
Price: 3.99 EPS 0 0
Shares Out. (in M): 152 P/E 0 0
Market Cap (in $M): 456 P/FCF 0 0
Net Debt (in $M): 0 EBIT 0 0
TEV ($): 456 TEV/EBIT 0 0

Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.

  • another AIMIA post - seriously?
  • seriously it's really cheap
  • hkup is certainly an expert on
  • About to overpay and buy back Aeroplan
  • anyone thing that tags might be really useful if people didn't use them just for snark?
  • Activists involved
  • snark FTW
  • That was quick
  • i appreciate the intellectual honesty
  • when facts change my views change

Description

Thesis Summary: Aimia has successfully completed the sale of their Canadian business (Aeroplan/Aimia Canada) and has paid down all of its debt.  As a result, they have C$600m of unrestricted cash on their balance sheet and reported on their new plan last Thursday, March 28th.  As part of this announcement, they disclosed that they plan to initiate a tender offer of up to C$150m CAD by mid-April, with the completion of this offer occurring by end May.  Mittleman Brothers (“Mittleman”) has provided their SOTP in the Q4 letter and their NAV is C$7.82/share, significantly above the current share price of C$3.99.  Given Mittleman’s involvement (they own 18% of the shares and have a Standstill Agreement (“Standstill) in place through July 2019) as well as Laughing Water’s recent board letter on March 27, 2019, I expect Aimia will need to tender substantially above the current share price in order to complete this tender.

Re-introduction: Aimia was first written up in 2013 and has subsequently been written up in ’16, ’17, and ’18.  The original thesis was a focus on the NOLs of the business and has changed to become an activist situation with a board fight. 

Activist recap: Mittleman Brothers (“Mittleman”) first became involved in 2017 and entered into a Standstill in March 2018.  As part of this, Mittleman selected two nominees (Philip Mittleman and Jeremey Rabe) and added a third, independent nominee, Brian Edwards.  Jeremy Rabe then became CEO of Aimia in May 2018.  Per the Standstill, (https://www.sedar.com/GetFile.do?lang=EN&docClass=35&issuerNo=00027127&issuerType=03&projectNo=02744787&docId=4281534) Mittleman is restricted until July 1 of this year and until then, they’ve agreed to vote entirely with management.  However, their original analysis shown here in their Q2 2018 letter (https://www.docdroid.net/5kBJvGL/mittleman-brothers-q2-2018-letter.pdf#page=4 ) focused on a transaction, with Aimia either selling off their individual businesses to capture the sum-of-the-parts or selling the business in its entirety.  In their Q4 letter (https://www.valuewalk.com/2019/02/mittleman-brothers-4q18-clear-media/ ), Mittleman highlighted their SOTP value at C$7.82/share, which doesn’t given Aimia any credit for their NOLs.  Given the price is currently C$3.99, the company needs to offer a meaningful premium to current prices in order to incentivize Mittleman and others to participate in the tender. 

Last Wednesday, Laughing Water Capital wrote a letter to the board (https://web.tmxmoney.com/article.php?newsid=8932180817296562&qm_symbol=AIM ) suggesting that the non-Mittleman board representatives resign in advance of the upcoming AGM.  In this letter, they highlight that these board directors would have failed to receive the necessary majority votes without the Mittleman required votes.  As a result, they posit that Mittleman will likely call a special election in July and remove these directors. 

Tender: On Thursday of last week, Aimia announced their plan to focus on consolidating the loyalty industry instead of a plan to realize the SOTP.  However, they also announced, via their presentation (https://www.aimia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Aimia_Q4-2018-Highlights-FINAL.pdf ), that they plan to initiate a tender offer up to C$150m (25% of the shares outstanding) by, “mid-April” and that they expect the offer will expire, “before the end of May 2019.”  Given the short timeline to the announcement, the contentious nature of the board, the soon to expire Standstill Agreement, and the activist focus, Aimia is incentivized to offer a meaningful premium to the current share price in order to successfully complete the repurchase of these shares.

Risks: The most immediate risk is that management go off the rails and announces a large acquisition.  In addition, a large double digit+ broad market decline in the next two weeks could cause Aimia to delay the tender.  Longer term, the biggest risk is that the company continues with their legacy of squandering their excess capital. 

I do not hold a position with the issuer such as employment, directorship, or consultancy.
I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.

Catalyst

- Company initiates a tender offer in the next two weeks at a meaningful premium to the current share price

- Company receives a takeover bid over the course of 2019 to capitalize on the ~C$800m of NOLs that are currently in place

- Mittleman Standstill Agreement expires in July 2019, which would all Mittleman to hold a special election and potentially focus on selling the company

    sort by    

    Description

    Thesis Summary: Aimia has successfully completed the sale of their Canadian business (Aeroplan/Aimia Canada) and has paid down all of its debt.  As a result, they have C$600m of unrestricted cash on their balance sheet and reported on their new plan last Thursday, March 28th.  As part of this announcement, they disclosed that they plan to initiate a tender offer of up to C$150m CAD by mid-April, with the completion of this offer occurring by end May.  Mittleman Brothers (“Mittleman”) has provided their SOTP in the Q4 letter and their NAV is C$7.82/share, significantly above the current share price of C$3.99.  Given Mittleman’s involvement (they own 18% of the shares and have a Standstill Agreement (“Standstill) in place through July 2019) as well as Laughing Water’s recent board letter on March 27, 2019, I expect Aimia will need to tender substantially above the current share price in order to complete this tender.

    Re-introduction: Aimia was first written up in 2013 and has subsequently been written up in ’16, ’17, and ’18.  The original thesis was a focus on the NOLs of the business and has changed to become an activist situation with a board fight. 

    Activist recap: Mittleman Brothers (“Mittleman”) first became involved in 2017 and entered into a Standstill in March 2018.  As part of this, Mittleman selected two nominees (Philip Mittleman and Jeremey Rabe) and added a third, independent nominee, Brian Edwards.  Jeremy Rabe then became CEO of Aimia in May 2018.  Per the Standstill, (https://www.sedar.com/GetFile.do?lang=EN&docClass=35&issuerNo=00027127&issuerType=03&projectNo=02744787&docId=4281534) Mittleman is restricted until July 1 of this year and until then, they’ve agreed to vote entirely with management.  However, their original analysis shown here in their Q2 2018 letter (https://www.docdroid.net/5kBJvGL/mittleman-brothers-q2-2018-letter.pdf#page=4 ) focused on a transaction, with Aimia either selling off their individual businesses to capture the sum-of-the-parts or selling the business in its entirety.  In their Q4 letter (https://www.valuewalk.com/2019/02/mittleman-brothers-4q18-clear-media/ ), Mittleman highlighted their SOTP value at C$7.82/share, which doesn’t given Aimia any credit for their NOLs.  Given the price is currently C$3.99, the company needs to offer a meaningful premium to current prices in order to incentivize Mittleman and others to participate in the tender. 

    Last Wednesday, Laughing Water Capital wrote a letter to the board (https://web.tmxmoney.com/article.php?newsid=8932180817296562&qm_symbol=AIM ) suggesting that the non-Mittleman board representatives resign in advance of the upcoming AGM.  In this letter, they highlight that these board directors would have failed to receive the necessary majority votes without the Mittleman required votes.  As a result, they posit that Mittleman will likely call a special election in July and remove these directors. 

    Tender: On Thursday of last week, Aimia announced their plan to focus on consolidating the loyalty industry instead of a plan to realize the SOTP.  However, they also announced, via their presentation (https://www.aimia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Aimia_Q4-2018-Highlights-FINAL.pdf ), that they plan to initiate a tender offer up to C$150m (25% of the shares outstanding) by, “mid-April” and that they expect the offer will expire, “before the end of May 2019.”  Given the short timeline to the announcement, the contentious nature of the board, the soon to expire Standstill Agreement, and the activist focus, Aimia is incentivized to offer a meaningful premium to the current share price in order to successfully complete the repurchase of these shares.

    Risks: The most immediate risk is that management go off the rails and announces a large acquisition.  In addition, a large double digit+ broad market decline in the next two weeks could cause Aimia to delay the tender.  Longer term, the biggest risk is that the company continues with their legacy of squandering their excess capital. 

    I do not hold a position with the issuer such as employment, directorship, or consultancy.
    I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.

    Catalyst

    - Company initiates a tender offer in the next two weeks at a meaningful premium to the current share price

    - Company receives a takeover bid over the course of 2019 to capitalize on the ~C$800m of NOLs that are currently in place

    - Mittleman Standstill Agreement expires in July 2019, which would all Mittleman to hold a special election and potentially focus on selling the company

    Messages


    SubjectRe: Tender price and possible take-out
    Entry04/03/2019 10:29 AM
    MemberMJS27

    abcd - i'd just note that i believe the majority of mittleman's business is seperately managed accounts, so you really can't read to much into the transactions.  they have been net sellers, but they have also bought shares YTD, which seems to suggest the buying and selling is business as usual for SMAs


    SubjectDutch tender
    Entry04/08/2019 08:53 AM
    MemberMJS27

    range of $3.80 to $4.50 and "Mittleman Brothers has notified Aimia that it does not intend to participate in the Offer."


    SubjectILS Business
    Entry04/08/2019 11:44 AM
    Memberstanley339

    New to this name - so I may just be missing something - but I'm suprised to see no one referring to the 'insights and loyalty' business in their SOTP. This seems to be the biggest chunk of revenue and is burning substantial cash despite shrinking top-line. Any thoughts? 


    SubjectRe: ILS Business
    Entry04/08/2019 01:30 PM
    MemberMJS27

    in the words of jon taffer, "shut it down"


    SubjectRe: Author Exit Recommendation
    Entry04/10/2019 09:22 AM
    MemberMJS27

    curious on the quick exit - were you expecting a higher range?

     

    With the stock trading at $4.17 yesterday i have to imagine this will go off at the top of the range ($4.50).  That is only 8% upside from recent trades, and I don't think arbs would be playing this for ~3% given the uncertainty on pricing.


    SubjectRe: Re: Author Exit Recommendation
    Entry04/10/2019 10:09 AM
    MemberMadDog2020

    I was surprised the range was so wide, especially that the low end was below the undisturbed price.  Also, I agree with you on expectation of pricing at the max but didn't think I could participate as a US investor given the withholding issues so as I wrote, this thesis was really about the pop, which was disappointing. 


    SubjectRe: Re: Re: Author Exit Recommendation
    Entry04/10/2019 10:21 AM
    MemberMJS27

    think i'm out of my depth here - i'm not sure exactly what you mean about not participating as a US investor given withholding issues? ty


    SubjectRe: Re: Re: Re: Author Exit Recommendation
    Entry04/10/2019 07:39 PM
    MemberMJS27

    not a tax expert, and clearly not super familiar with canadian tenders, and recommend you speak with your tax advisor, but my understanding is that this tender will not be taxable because the funds behind the tender are the result of actions outside the course of ordinary business. in other words, they sold aeroplan, and are returning cash from that sale. situations such as return of capital following the sale of a division are not taxable under a carve out.  i am sure we will get more details when the actual docs are made public (expected tomorrow 4/11) but i think we are good here.


    SubjectRe: Re: Re: Re: Re: Author Exit Recommendation
    Entry04/11/2019 04:33 PM
    MemberMadDog2020

    Thanks for looking MJS.  I'm not an expert either or super familiar but I'm not sure the return of capital idea is right.  This looks like there's tax slippage because the tender proceeds are coming through as a dividend, despite being a return of capital.  But, I'm with you that I'm far from an expert on this stuff.

      A Non-Canadian Resident Shareholder who sells Shares to Aimia pursuant to the Offer will be deemed to receive a dividend equal to the excess of the amount paid by Aimia for the Shares over their paid-up capital for Canadian income tax purposes. Aimia estimates that the paid-up capital per Share on the date hereof is approximately $0.01 (and following the Expiration Date, Aimia will advise Shareholders of any material change to this estimate). As a result, Aimia expects that Non-Canadian Resident Shareholders who sell Shares pursuant to the Offer will be deemed to receive a dividend for purposes of the Tax Act. The exact quantum of the deemed dividend cannot be guaranteed. Any such dividend will be subject to Canadian withholding tax at a rate of 25% or such lower rate as may be substantiated under the terms of an applicable tax treaty. For example, a dividend received or deemed to be received by a Non-Canadian Resident Shareholder that is a resident of the United States for the purposes of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (the “U.S. Treaty”), is eligible for benefits under the U.S. Treaty, and is the beneficial owner of such dividends will generally be subject to withholding tax at a treaty-reduced rate of 15%. 

      Back to top