2013 | 2014 | ||||||
Price: | 6.37 | EPS | -$1.61 | $0.20 | |||
Shares Out. (in M): | 17 | P/E | nmf | nmf | |||
Market Cap (in $M): | 105 | P/FCF | nmf | nmf | |||
Net Debt (in $M): | 98 | EBIT | -20 | 10 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 203 | TEV/EBIT | nmf | nmf |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Event-driven Long: Vitran Corporation (NASDAQ: VTNC, TSX: VTN), a turnaround play at a key inflection point with "hidden assets" and near term catalysts that have granted shareholders two "put options" on the stock, reducing downside risk. I believe that this stock offers 100% - 180% upside in the medium term.
Summary
Vitran Corporation (“Vitran”, “VTNC”, or the “Company”) is a trucking company that offers Less-than-Truckload (“LTL”) and Supply Chain (“SCO”) services to shippers across 34 states and Canada. VTNC transports goods largely for retail, manufacturing and chemical customers, and also handles logistics for mainly retail customers.
While the Company’s operations are US-focused, VTNC incorporated in 1981 in Ontario, under Business Corporation Act (Ontario), which is important because poison pills in Canada are essentially useless in a hostile take-over scenario. I mention this because two LTL competitors, Transforce (TSX: TFI) and Clarke (TSX: CKI) have both taken advantage of the depressed share price to establish 1.7mm share (10.75%) and 1mm share (6.2%) toe-holds in the Company, respectively. Both investors have recently filed 13Ds and each has a different plan for VTNC, which in TFI’s case could be a hostile take-over.
The Company’s main asset, its US LTL operation, has been a poor performer and clouds the results from its other two fantastic businesses. It has recently made significant operational and management changes to the US LTL business in 2012 and expects a turnaround as a result of revenue and cost-cutting initiatives. If no near-term operational turnaround occurs and the stock lags, evidence indicates that TFI may launch a take-over or CKI may try to split up the Company. These two “put options” reduce the downside if the turnaround plan is fruitless. VTNC’s high operational leverage and moderate financial leverage give shareholders high torque to the turnaround scenario. This unique combination of high potential upside with downside protection makes Vitran a highly asymmetric investment opportunity.
Company Overview
US$000s | ||
VTNC US Equity | $6.37 | |
Basic Shares O/S | 16,399 | |
Dilutive Securities | 71 | |
F/D Shares | 16,470 | |
Market Cap | $104,917 | |
Term Bank Credit Facilities | $2,750 | |
Revolving Credit Facilities | $42,656 | |
Real Estate Facility | $45,768 | |
Capital Leases | $6,751 | |
Total Debt | $97,925 | |
Cash | $0 | |
Net Debt | $97,925 | |
Enterprise Value | $202,842 | |
EV / EBITDA (2014E consensus) | 5.1x |
VTNC’s business can be grouped into three segments:
Since the Company does not geographically segment its operating ratio, I backed into the consolidated operating ratio using guidance from the Q2 2011 conference call, in which CEO Richard Gaetz stated “Our Canadian LTL business is, as you know, an asset-lighter model. So when it runs optimally, it runs kind of low mid 90s, if that makes sense, kind of 92-93 range, when it’s running optimally. Right now, it’s operating sub-95, so it’s doing fine in this recovery period. There is upside for us for sure, but it’s operating very well and generating great returns on capital as it normally does… And our US LTL business operated over 100 in Q2. The last two months, it operated at just over 100, under 101 and just over 100… It’s absolutely unacceptable… we’re chasing 8 operating points.” I utilized my estimated segmented OR to estimate the segmented EBITDA, which gives a clearer picture of the poor state that the US LTL operation is in, which when consolidated with the very good SCO and Canadian results, paints VTNC as a whole to be a bad company.
Segmented Data | LTM | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |
EBITDA | |||||||||||
LTL | -$8,536 | $5,408 | $21,200 | $14,618 | $27,253 | $42,105 | $39,203 | $30,452 | $22,058 | $20,088 | |
SCO | $11,253 | $11,692 | $8,561 | $7,078 | $6,035 | $3,959 | $3,101 | $2,516 | $1,993 | $1,326 | |
Corporate | -$5,361 | -$5,023 | -$4,504 | -$3,930 | -$4,558 | -$5,025 | -$4,356 | -$3,461 | -$2,201 | -$2,203 | |
Total | -$2,644 | $12,077 | $25,257 | $17,766 | $28,730 | $41,039 | $37,948 | $29,507 | $21,850 | $19,211 | |
Operating Ratio | |||||||||||
LTL | 103.3% | 101.4% | 99.2% | 100.5% | 98.5% | 96.0% | 93.7% | 93.1% | 94.2% | 94.3% | |
SCO | 91.8% | 91.4% | 92.4% | 92.8% | 94.6% | 93.8% | 93.3% | 94.7% | 95.3% | 96.2% | |
Estimated Segemented LTL OR | |||||||||||
LTL - Canada | 95.0% | 94.5% | 92.0% | 92.0% | |||||||
LTL - US | 106.5% | 104.0% | 102.0% | 104.0% | |||||||
Estimated Segmented EBITDA | |||||||||||
LTL - Canada | $14,168 | $14,714 | $18,475 | $16,714 | |||||||
LTL - US | -$22,443 | -$9,103 | $3,796 | -$2,397 | |||||||
SCO | $11,253 | $11,692 | $8,561 | $7,078 | |||||||
Corporate | -$5,361 | -$5,023 | -$4,504 | -$3,930 |
Turnaround
Vitran’s stock price would most likely react positively to a decline in operating ratio. Over the past six years, VTNC’s stock price and quarterly operating ratio have had a -0.85 correlation.
It is hard to imagine VTNC’s operating getting much worse than Q3 2012’s 105.2, which was over 700 bps higher than the second worse competitor. At this operating ratio, VTNC is losing over 5 cents per each dollar of revenue. It would be better to just turn down customers, which would automatically lead to better numbers. The CEO stated in the Q2 2012 conference call that "by this time next year should provide our US LTL operation with about seven points of operating improvements". This forecast would place the US LTL OR at around 97-98, bringing the overall operating ratio slightly worse than peer average. The Company has sufficient liquidity for now to execute, with $20.5mm of available credit facilities.
Although each line item has room to improve, management states that labor remains the biggest opportunity to reduce expenses.
The recent poor results could partly be blamed on significant recent management changes, with 14 executives replaced in the five months to Q2 2012 and an additional five in Q3, along with a total of 23 facility managers (31% of total facilities, 12 in Q3). On January 10 2012, Vitran hired highly-respected former Fedex Freight executive Chris Keylon as US LTL President to spearhead this turnaround. In Q2 2012 management outlined its “11 point plan” to improve operating results over the next 12 months, with the goal of a 7 percentage point improvement operating ratio. The clock is ticking…
Valuation
Vitran has spent considerable money on US LTL acquisitions to gain size by consolidating smaller operators:
Announce Date | Target | Announced Value ($mm) | Payment Type | Revenue | EBITDA (LTM) | EBITDA % | EV / EBITDA (LTM) | EV / Sales (LTM) |
14-Jan-11 | LTL Business of Milan Express | $7.6 | Cash | $70.0 | n/a | n/a | 0.1x | |
2-Oct-06 | PJAX Freight System | $132.0 | Cash and Stock | $175.0 | $23.1 | 13% | 7.6x | 0.8x |
19-Dec-05 | Sierra West Express Inc | $2.5 | Undisclosed | $16.0 | $1.0 | 6% | 16.0x | 0.2x |
31-May-05 | Chris Truck Line | $29.3 | Cash and Stock | $28.9 | $4.6 | 16% | 6.3x | 1.0x |
Total / Average | $171.4 | $289.9 | $28.7 | 10.0x | 0.5x | |||
SCO: | ||||||||
30-Nov-07 | Las Vegas LA Express Inc | $12.6 | Cash | $25.5 | $3.5 | 14% | 7.3x | 0.5x |
The Company’s LTL acquisitions have been completed around 6.0x – 7.5x EBITDA. Other comparable transactions have been within this range:
Date | Buyer | Target | EV ($mm) | EV/EBITDA (LTM) | EV/Rev (LTM) | EBITDA Margin (LTM) | EV/EBITDA (NTM) | Price / Book | Premium to Unaffected |
1-Jun-12 | Arkansas Best | Panther Expedited | $180.0 | 7.5x | 0.8x | 11% | |||
1-Feb-12 | Entrec Transportation | Singer Specialized | $15.3 | 3.8x | |||||
1-Nov-11 | Radiant Logistics | Isla International | $15.0 | 5.0x | 0.6x | 12% | |||
1-Sep-11 | The Gores Group | Clark Holdings | $7.7 | 4.5x | 0.1x | 3% | 0.9x | 171% | |
1-May-11 | Roadrunner Transportation | Bruenger Trucking | $13.6 | 3.9x | |||||
1-Feb-11 | Roadrunner Transportation | Morgan Southern | $20.0 | 5.0x | 0.4x | 7% | |||
1-Dec-10 | TransForce | Dynamex | $220.0 | 10.4x | 0.5x | 5% | 9.6x | 2.2x | 63% |
1-Sep-10 | Trucking Investment | US 1 Industries | $29.8 | 9.9x | 0.2x | 2% | 43% | ||
Average | 6.3x | 0.4x | 7% | 9.6x | 1.6x | 92% |
Historically, D&A has been about 2% of revenue. Combining this with the previously estimated segmented ORs, I estimate a segmented EBITDA in the sum of parts analysis below. I value Canadian LTL in-line with precedent transactions of 6.0x – 7.0x. The SCO segment is higher growth and deserves a higher multiple of 7.5x – 8.5x. The result is $90mm - $120mm for Canadian LTL and $80mm - $110mm for SCO. The sum of these two operations gets us to the current enterprise value of the Company (ignoring G&A), implying that the market values the US LTL business at zero.
As for valuing the US LTL operations, I look at two scenarios. The first scenario imagines a US LTL turnaround in which ORs go in-line with peers at 95% and EBITDA margins around 7%. Applying a 5.0x – 5.5x multiple, which is where the sector has traded historically, I get to a value of $165mm - $195mm for this segment. The second scenario imagines no turnaround and values the segment at 0.1x – 0.2x revenue, in-line with other poorly performing transportation companies. The result is $50mm - $100mm for US LTL (which was pieced together for $170mm+).
Adjusting for G&A and net debt gets us to intrinsic values well in excess of the current stock price, as shown below. In addition, the Company has $65mm of NOLs, which could further bolster US LTL value in a turnaround situation (I have ascribed no value to these).
Canadian LTL | Low | High | |
Estimated Revenue | $200,000 | $200,000 | |
Estimated Margin | 7.5% | 8.5% | |
Estimated EBITDA | $15,000 | $17,000 | |
Multiple | 6.0x | 7.0x | |
Canadian LTL Value | $90,000 | $119,000 | |
% of Current EV | 44.4% | 58.7% | |
SCO | |||
Estimated Revenue | $125,000 | $125,000 | |
Estimated Margin | 9.5% | 10.5% | |
Estimated EBITDA | $11,875 | $13,125 | |
Multiple | 7.5x | 8.5x | |
SCO Value | $89,063 | $111,563 | |
% of Current EV | 43.9% | 55.0% | |
VTN Ex-US LTL Value | $179,062 | $230,562 | |
% of Current EV | 88.3% | 113.7% | |
US LTL (Turnaround Scenario) | |||
Estimated Revenue | $510,000 | $510,000 | |
Theoretical Margin | 6.5% | 7.0% | |
Estimated EBITDA | $33,150 | $35,700 | |
Multiple | 5.0x | 5.5x | |
US LTL Value (Turnaround) | $165,750 | $196,350 | |
US LTL (No Turnaround) | |||
Estimated Revenue | $510,000 | $510,000 | |
Multiple | 0.1x | 0.2x | |
US LTL Value (No Turnaround) | $51,000 | $102,000 | |
Corporate G&A (@7x) | $37,527 | $37,527 | |
Net Debt | $97,925 | $97,925 | |
Intrinsic Value with Turnaround | $209,360. | $291,460 | |
per share | $12.71 | $17.70 | |
Upside | 100% | 178% | |
Intrinsic Value without Turnaround | $94,611 | $197,111 | |
per share | $5.75 | $11.97 | |
Upside | -10% | 88% |
Shareholder Actions
On October 8 2012, Clarke filed a 13D with a letter to the Chairman attached. Clarke is a hybrid operating company and investment firm with an EV of $140mm. It is run by activist George Armoyan. Clarke runs a Canadian LTL operation, which accounts for 86% of its revenue. The letter detailed disappointment in management, accusation of poor allocation of capital (true), the threat of a proxy battle, in addition to a restructuring plan. This plan includes selling the SCO segment for $100mm, implementing a substantial issuer bid at $7.00 per share and redeploying capital to the Canadian LTL business. Clarke estimates this restructuring would lead to a VTNC share price of $12.00 - $18.00. Interestingly enough, in its Q2 2012 MD&A it states that “Clarke also believes that Vitran’s Canadian LTL business would complement Clarke’s freight transportation business”. So Clarke clearly has an ulterior motive here. Armoyan requested a board seat but was ultimately rejected because Clarke is a competitor. There is no question that a corporate restructuring would unlock significant value at VTNC. CKI owns 1,008,417 VTNC shares (6.15%).
On December 31 2012, Transforce filed a 13D. Transforce is a highly acquisitive consolidator with an EV of $2.8bn and ~$350mm of liquidity (adjusted for recent Velocity Express acquisition). The 13D did not reveal much, but a research piece put out by RBC shortly thereafter was interesting to say the least: "We had the opportunity to speak to TFI's CEO regarding the 13D... It is TFI’s view that if the turn-around is successful (and the shares appreciate in value), then TFI will take profit and exit its stake. If however the turn-around is unsuccessful, TFI may look at acquiring VTNC outright... The TFI CEO made it very clear, however, that it is interested only in VTNC's Canadian operations and has no interest in running a U.S. LTL operation". TFI owns 1,763,478 VTNC shares (10.75%) and has been in the market buying aggressively.
Insiders only own 4.7% of the Company. Chairman Richard McGraw had a 35.2% withheld / abstain vote last AGM, held on April 24 2012. Note that in 2013, the Toronto Stock Exchange is implementing new rules, which includes the adoption of a majority voting director resignation policy or explanation of why such policy has not been adopted. McGraw’s feet are to the fire here and with the potential for a >50% Withhold vote and forced resignation, he may want to look at implementing drastic shareholder-friendly actions real soon.
Conclusion
Competitors and an activist have used the depressed stock price, caused by temporary poor results out of only one segment, to establish toe-holds in the company. The Chairman is facing serious shareholder backlash and could potentially get voted out in three months. Management needs to show results on its turnaround strategy quickly or the Board needs to evaluate strategic alternatives. The market currently values the US LTL segment (62% of revenue) at zero. Shareholders have high torque to a potential turnaround, which could result in the stock appreciating 100% - 180% in the next twelve months. If the turnaround is unsuccessful, the company would be vulnerable to a hostile take-over by Transforce or a proxy fight in which the company would be restructured, both of which would unlock significant value leading to a higher stock price than current.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position VITRAN CORP INC?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea VITRAN CORP INC for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".