|Shares Out. (in M):||701||P/E||11.1||0|
|Market Cap (in $M):||28,249||P/FCF||NM||0|
|Net Debt (in $M):||-3,300||EBIT||2||0|
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
This write-up will be focused on the January 2020 call options with a $10 strike price. Currently these options are trading at 50 cents, which seems far too low given the stock was trading far above those levels so recently and the intrinsic value of the stock is so obviously far above the current price. This write-up will examine what has happened to the stock over the last 6 months (since the last write-up), then conclude with an analysis of the options at play.
This note follows-up on the one posted by Shoe on April 10. Since April the stock has plunged well over 60% to valuation levels (on an enterprise value basis) not seen since 2013 when the company's revenue was close to 10% of the current level. What precipitated this dramatic decline? VIPS did not deliver on the revenue growth acceleration that the market expected post-JD/Tencent tie-up, and as a result the stock has been forsaken by the "growthy cohort", and now finds itself plumbing the depths of the void. And plumb the void it has. It is now over 75% down from the high and trading near liquidation value. Is it time for the value crowd to step in?
Following the minority investment by JD and Tencent the market believed that VIPS would be able to re-accelerate its revenue growth back from the mid-20's perhaps back up above 30%. This is was not an unreasonable assumption given the relative scale of VIPS vs. Tencent and JD. However, it turns out that the past 2 quarters have been relatively disappointing (only meeting estimates), and more importantly guidance has been very disappointing - for example the company has indicated mid to high teens growth for 3Q18. The market did not like this as it was anticipating a re-acceleration of growth - and while growth investors in the US are exacting with their growth extrapolation of many hot companies, it seems that in China they are even more so. Maybe VIPS has been replaced by PDD, which is expected to grow revenue at 520% in 2018 (and therefore has a 18x EV/2018 revenue multiple). At any rate VIPS has a profile of 10-20% revenue CAGR right now, which is not enough for the growth community.
And, of course, while the revenue growth trajectory is uncertain, margins are also under pressure. Their gross margin has continued to decline from ~25% a few years ago to closer to 20% most recently. Even though they have scaled up it is hard to out-lever such a margin decline and so their earnings growth has stalled. This is because the competitive pressure in the ecommerce arena has been intense! Not everybody can grow at 520% per annum for obvious reasons.
So where does this leave us? Is it all doom and gloom?
· First, the company does have its own niche as a partner to brands - they are a critical albeit nichey player in the ecommerce ecosystem as they are focused on liquidating off-season merchandise. So, the company does have a reason to exist and it does fulfill a purpose in the economy
· The revenue is still growing mid-teens which is my mind is solid on an absolute basis
· It is still profitable.
· Importantly for a Chinese company, it is definitively not a fraud. Aside from the fact that it is consumer facing and obviously a real company, the technology and value add has been validated by JD and Tencent
· It has negative net leverage and the wherewithal to continue operating without any real capital structure pressure as they have 8.5bn rmb of cash and ST investment on BS. Given the company’s liquidity and the fact that it is profitable, it would appear to have a long runway to figure out a way to unlock value from its existing user base or start growing again.
· It is now insanely cheap (see below)
Some other points
· Margin pressure is somewhat overstated as recent accounting changes probably subtracted a point or so off gross margins recently. Of course, there is still real margin pressure. The company has indicated that they are going to refocus more on their core off-season apparel business and decrease focus on general in-season merchandise. This should result in slower growth but perhaps better margins, which is fine for a value investor
o Management indicated they are willing to take on more inventory risk to get better brands on the platform. Unclear what the risk profile of this is
· The company's founder still controls the company and has not sold any shares. He owns over 10% of the company and is economically aligned
· Validated valuation support - we have seen that Tencent and JD did their original transaction at $13.50. More importantly JD continued buying shares in 2Q at an average price of $14.1517 per share (i.e.. higher than the original deal price)
· Capitulation in share price probably based on the broader China bear market. If China was not in a bear market perhaps the shares would be trading higher than they are today, offering less insanely good risk reward
· FCF conversion still low because they are investing in capex
· Did the JD/Tencent plug-in fail? It is unclear. Certainly, the results had not been as strong or sharp as the market expected, but it probably takes a few quarters for them to optimize.
· In my estimation VIPS is trading at around cash + receivables + warehouses. This is unheard of for a company that is profitable and growing at a double-digit rate. Particularly if they are profitable!
· It is trading at under 0.3x EV/revenue, 15x LTM adjusted earnings (adjusted earnings are similar to GAAP earnings)
· Value bridge:
o Equity value as of Friday's close is 28.2bn RMB
o Cash and ST investments of 8.5bn rmb
o Consumer accounts/loans receivables of 4.6bn (this is primarily related to consumer finance business and not other general receivables of which there are 3.7bn)
§ No credit for inventory - 4.6bn (value folds into the "free ecommerce business")
o Warehouses - Probably worth ~5-10bn at least
§ This is tricky because they own 1.8mm sqm and we need to apply some rough value to it – I’ve seen reports estimating at around 5k rmb psm and another estimating it at 1rmb rent pd psm @ 50% margin capitalized at 15x
§ No value for leased warehouses though of course the value of those fold into the "free logistics business"
o Land use rights - Probably 4.3bn
§ I've seen a report taking BV and grossing up based on location. Tends to result in a 25-50% uplift from book value
o Total - 27.4bn (assuming the 10bn for land)
· Based on this you are getting for free:
o The core ecommerce business (i.e. the point of the thing), albeit at a somewhat higher cost base assuming they had to lease out all their warehouses
o Consumer finance business (which other players have been able to monetize)
o Logistic business (again other players have been able to monetize)
Given all the factors listed above at play for the stock, we believe the best way to play this is with long term (January 2020) options with a strike price modestly above the current level. If the company reverts close to the value assigned to it by the strategics, you make 6x on these options. At its most recent peak, around when it was written up earlier this year, this is an 18x investment. Given the potential for upside in the stock in the short term, as the partnership with JD and Tencent pays off and revenue growth reaccelerates, there is additional upside from here.
Aside from the better potential upside, this actually may be a better way to limit downside given the dynamics in the stock. Within the next 15 months it will become much more clear whether the partnership will pay off. Moreover, it will become more clear if margins are in a state of permanent decline, or if they can stabilize around current levels. Finally, if the downside case plays out, it will provide management enough time to evaluate a potential strategic bailout and decide whether they prefer to maximize value or retain control. The point is, if a bunch of these things play out really negatively, then the stock might be worth close to 0 (a probability the market seems to be taking seriously given the current stock price). In that case you are better off limiting your capital at risk. BUT, if even a few things go right for the stock, then the stock should pass $10 very quickly. Given how cheap the options are, they seem like the ideal vehicle to capture much of the upside on the stock over the next year with limited risk of capital loss in the event management decides to go down with the ship.
· The company's moat is not the most robust - trends in consumer behavior in the ecommerce arena are subject to change quickly and this is absolutely a risk with VIPS. Valid concern but you have the shares trading so cheap that you have liquidation value protection
· The more immediate risk is what happens with revenue growth and margins? For reasons explained it is probable that revenue will continue to grow in the teens which is okay by me but there is no guarantee. With a modulated growth profile perhaps the margin pressure will abate but who knows? FWIW the company has guided to a margin rebound in the intermediate time frame
· Generic china macro risk
What would break the thesis?
· If there is no improvement in growth stats, and the market takes too long to recognize the intrinsic value of the stock
· If margins continue to compress while revenue growth slows and they swing to a loss-making operation
Other thoughts on comps
· TJX is the US comp, brick and mortar, see how it trades? To be fair it has higher gross margins (which translates into high net margins). Lower growth than VIPS (mid-high single digit to low double digit). More mature for high FCF conversion. 1.7x EV/revenue
· M&A for similar stuff like Zulily in the US has been @ 2x revenue
· VIPS has really been displaced as the one of the top ecommerce companies by PDD it seems. Just an anecdotal observation.
|show sort by|
Are you sure you want to close this position VIPSHOP HOLDINGS LTD - 01/17/20 Call Options?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea VIPSHOP HOLDINGS LTD - 01/17/20 Call Options for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".