2006 | 2007 | ||||||
Price: | 49.13 | EPS | |||||
Shares Out. (in M): | 0 | P/E | |||||
Market Cap (in $M): | 2,823 | P/FCF | |||||
Net Debt (in $M): | 0 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 0 | TEV/EBIT | |||||
Borrow Cost: | NA |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
We are recommending a short of Tidewater Marine (TDW) due to high valuation and our expectation of an imminent cyclical downturn in the OSV (offshore supply vessel) market over the next 6-12 months. The offshore supply vessel (OSV) market is facing an onslaught of new ships being delivered over the next two years as high industry returns encouraged high order rates of new vessels. It is our expectation that supply pressure from new vessels will cause a decline in utilization and day rates by the second half of 2007 leading to significant earnings downgrades in the future.
Company Description:
Tidewater is an OSV operator in the Gulf of Mexico, Europe,
Numbers
Price: 51.92
Market Cap: $2.92 B
Price to Book- 1.72x
Dividend Yield- 1.2%
EV/07EBITDA (Street) - 5.9x
EV/07EBITDA (Our) – 8.3x
P/E 07 (Street) - 8.8x
P/E 07 (Our) - 14.9x
Industry background:
Over the past few years, new exploration for oil and natural gas have caused a spike in OSV rates as utilization on existing rigs increased and a number of new rigs were placed into operation. Additionally, demand in the
Thesis:
We believe that OSV day rates should start to collapse during 1H07 and earnings downgrades should materialize as the market comes to the realization that supply will exceed demand for OSVs in a relatively short timeframe. Most of the street is positive on the sector/stock and have normalized these peak margins for the next couple of years. We believe that as supply comes to market, current un-stainable margins will decline. It is our belief that nothing has changed fundamentality in the industry to warrant a sustained margin shift as OSVs are relatively commoditized vessels and easy to produce in the shipbuilding world.
Although much of our thesis is a sector call, we also like the micro short story for TDW. Competitors, such as Bourbon (GBB FP), may look more expensive in terms of multiple yet their fleets are much younger. One of the big advantages of newer boats is that fuel efficiency is much higher (fuel costs are borne by the company leasing the OSV, not the owner). Beyond overall industry day rates declining, we think there will be a further divergence in the rates charged on newer versus older vessels. Tidewater’s aged fleet will ultimately suffer the most in the coming downturn.
Fleet Replacement:
Unlike many of its competitors, Tidewater’s management has decided to delay the replacement of its aging fleet (current order book stands at 25 new vessels). New orders at shipyards are taking anywhere from 12 to 18 months for delivery given the enormous size of the current backlog from other operators. Tidewater seems to have put itself in a precarious situation as many of it boats may need to be stacked or scrapped over the next few years and many of its competitors have spent the necessary Capex dollars to remain competitive in the current market.
Supply and Demand:
As with many other commodity businesses, spikes of profitability inevitably attract more supply and competition. The current situation in the OSV market is no different. Consultants estimate that the 2 year order book worldwide is between 450 and 500 new boats on a worldwide fleet of around 3,500 boats.
Demand created from new jack ups and platforms should range between 140 and 160 new boats per year for the next few years. This calculation is based on the number of new rigs (23 to 25) and the combination of fixed (33 to 35) and floating platforms (36-38) being placed into the international and domestic market over next year. It takes approximately two medium sized supply vessels to service a rig or floating platform and one to service a fixed platform. These are approximate numbers and newer vessels are more efficient (i.e. bigger, faster, etc.) meaning that these numbers may be conservative. We believe that demand is one of the least understood components by the market and is often not quantified properly by the sell-side.
Here are the unit economics of supplying a new OSV to the market under current conditions:
Unit Economics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appox. Cost of a new OSV |
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
Debt (50%) |
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
Cost of Debt |
8% |
|
|
|
Interest Cost |
240,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Capital Calculation |
|
|
| |
GOM |
|
International | ||
Day Rates |
12000 |
|
Day Rates |
8300 |
All in Cost of Operation |
3200 |
|
All in Cost of Operation |
3100 |
Operating Profit Day |
8800 |
|
Operating Profit Day |
5200 |
Utilization |
80% |
|
Utilization |
80% |
Days a Year |
365 |
|
Days a Year |
365 |
EBT Per Boat |
2,569,600 |
|
EBT Per Boat |
1,518,400 |
Tax Rate |
35% |
|
Tax Rate |
22% |
NI |
1,670,240 |
|
NI |
1,184,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
ROI |
28% |
|
ROI |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Equity Calculation |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
GOM |
|
International | ||
EBT Per Boat |
2,329,600 |
|
EBT Per Boat |
1,278,400 |
Tax Rate |
35% |
|
Tax Rate |
22% |
NI |
1,514,240 |
|
NI |
997,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
50% |
|
ROE |
33% |
As you can see the economics of currently supplying one of these commoditized boats to the market is extremely attractive. Under our assumptions ROI over time should bottom closer to 8-10% in such a commodity business.
TDW Historical EBITDA Margins (Cyclical Business):
Peaks (97, 01) - 45% and 40% respectively
Troughs (93, 00, 04) - 22%, 17%, 22% respectively
Current margin- 45%
Normalized margin between 26% and 32%
Risks:
Conclusion:
Over the next two years we expect rates and utilization to be driven back to historical levels as supply begins to apply significant downward pressure on OSV operators. In the
Valuation:
Based on our assumptions, we believe normalized earnings is somewhere around $2.50/share. If we apply a 12x earnings multiple (we think this is appropriate for a cyclical business such as this) on our normalized number, then we come up with a fair value of around $30/share (about 40% downside from the current stock price). Furthermore, we believe that the risk for potential upside in the stock is limited. It is tough to argue that rates will continue to rise given the enormous wave of supply that is set to come out in the next couple of years. If rates only flatten (instead of fall as we predicted) one would be buying a stock at a 10.5 times earnings multiple with no growth potential and a company facing a huge Capex cycle spend over the next 4 years to replace its scrapped/stacked supply fleet.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position Tidewater?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea Tidewater for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".