Pharmaceutical packaging manufacturer is seeing improvement in its secular growth prospects; trades at a discount to its closest competitor; upside kicker from success of GLP-1s
Investment Highlights
Accelerating Business in Attractive Industry
Industry growth is accelerating from historical MSD range to 10%+; driven by increasing prevalence of biologics, GLP-1s, and penetration of High Value Solutions (“HVS”, higher price/value delivery solutions like autoinjectors, pens, and ready-to-use vials + cartridges)
SCHOTT’s HVS are driving double digit consolidated revenue growth
HVS as a % of total revenues increased from 39% in 2022 to 48% in 2023; management expects HVS ~50% for 2024 and to reach 60% over the medium-term
HVS growth rates are ~3x the growth rate of non-HVS solutions
HVS are not only accretive to growth, but to margins as well; we estimate HVS margins of ~35% vs low 20% range for non-HVS
Industry is an oligopoly with solid pricing power
Only a small number of companies can reliably fulfill large global contracts increasingly demanded by global pharma companies
Industry is dominated by SCHOTT Pharma, Stevanato, Gerresheimer, and Becton-Dickinson; adjacent (albeit less direct) suppliers include West Pharma and Aptar Group
Fulfillment of global contracts requires meaningful access to capital; this will further entrench the top suppliers at the expense of smaller regional competitors; this is particularly true in HVS so the top tier suppliers will have increasing access to both the faster growing and higher value added subsegments of the industry
Customer are largely price insensitive, particularly in HVS; cost of delivery system is typically immaterial relative to the cost of a biologic or GLP-1; the most important metrics are quality and ability to provide steady supply; this favors the large suppliers and leads to steady, predictable pricing power
SCHOTT has solid market shares across most pharma delivery modalities: #1 in ampoules, #1 in vials, #2 in cartridges, #3 in glass syringes, #1 in polymer syringes
Trend from bulk vials/cartridges → ready-to-use vials/cartridges should provide meaningful growth tailwinds
Bulk vials/cartridges currently represent >95% of the vials market; bulk vials have to be sterilized prior to use (by pharma manufacturers, fill-finish companies, CDMOs, etc.)
SCHOTT (and its competitors) have begun vertically integrating into sterilization and shipping ready-to-use (“RTU”) vials/cartridges
RTU vials/cartridges are a HVS, and sell at a substantial premium with accretive margins
SCHOTT and its competitors went through a similar transition with syringes over the past couple of decades, and RTU syringes went from 10% market share to >95% today
We expect that a similar long-term shift is now beginning for vials/cartridges; this could provide multi-decade growth tailwinds
On-track for medium-term targets
Revenue growth 10%+
EBITDA margins 30%+ (up from current 26-27%)
23-25% (up from 20%)
SCHOTT delivered vs fiscal 2023 consensus despite emerging concern over destocking in the bulk vial segment of its business (see Risks section)
Free cash flow should improve meaningfully going forward; company is currently investing heavily to expand capacity in HVS and for GLP-1s, specifically; should start to see meaningful acceleration in free cash flow starting in 2026
Solid returns on capital: mid-teens ROIC (15-16%), 20-25% ROE
Strategic supply agreement with parent SCHOTT Group, a major global glass producer, ensures access to key manufacturing input at attractive terms going forward
Secularly Growing Industry
Attractive growing industry in pharma/biologics
Biologics are accounting for a disproportionate share of pharma industry growth
FDA approval of biologics went from 28% of total approvals in 2021 to 50% in 2022
>50% of overall pharma industry R&D is for biotech vs 30% of total pharma industry sales for biotech
Biologic strength benefits syringes, the preferred delivery modality
Estimated 2022-27 biopharma injectable CAGR of 15% (per Stevanato/IQVIA)
Biologics have a heavy reliance on glass vials; many biologics are caustic to plastic containers and sensitive to light and metals (which favors glass containers, where GXI has a strong position)
Seven of the top 10 selling drugs globally are injectables
GLP-1 Accelerates Growth with High Visibility
GLP1s provide an upside kicker
Company is one of a small number of providers for GLP-1 packaging (syringes and autoinjectors)
€1bn of current GLP-1 backlog; more likely to come
GLP-1 business is margin accretive
GLP-1s (diabetes, weight control) expected to continue to show strong continued growth over next few years; currently ~$20bn market, expected to grow to $75bn+ by 2030
Injection is currently the preferred modality for GLP-1s; injection is the only available modality for newer GLP-1s although some older formulations available in oral
We believe that injection is likely to remain preferred modality for diabetics; oral may take share for weight loss purposes
Valuation Discount and Market Discovery
US investors are just beginning to wake up to the secular growth story around key pharma packaging manufacturers
VIC writeups as a proxy: one writeup (Jan 2023) on Stevanato, one writeup (Mar 2004) on West Pharma, no writeups on SCHOTT Pharma, no writeups on Gerresheimer
To-date, there haven’t been a lot of ways to play the favorable themes
SCHOTT Pharma is a recent carve-out of its parent SCHOTT Group; went public in Sep 2023
Stevanato (Italian) has only had a US listing since mid-2021
Gerresheimer has been public for >15 years; however, as the worst-managed (until recently) of the large operators it was a poor public facing representative for the industry; low-growth, poor FCF, focus on commodity grade solutions, etc.
We believe that SCHOTT (and its competitors) represent an attractive discounted way to play the GLP-1s with lower drug-specific risk
SCHOTT Pharma trades at a 4-turn discount to its closest competitor, Stevanato
20x EBITDA vs 24x for Stevanato
This despite an arguably equal-to-better profile
Similar EBITDA growth expected over 3-yr time horizon
SCHOTT has a higher attribution to HVS than Stevanato (48% vs 33%); EBITDA multiples are typically highly correlated with % of revenue attributable to HVS
Equal-to-better ROIC and ROE
Comparable Re-rating Example in Industry
Adjacent (not direct) competitor West Pharma provides an encouraging case study for how a combination of solid revenue growth, improved margins, and expanding ROICs can drive meaningful multiple expansion
For many years, West Pharma has been one of the few ways for investors to play the theme of a quality business benefiting from pharma packaging tailwinds
West Pharma 2013-23
8% revenue CAGR
900bp of margin expansion
1200bp of ROIC expansion
EV/EBITDA multiple went from ~10x → 26x
Business
Drug Containment Solutions (~75% of revs): ampoules, vials, and cartridges
Drug Delivery Systems (~25% of revs): glass syringes, polymer syringes
Upside/Downside
22x EV/EBITDA target multiple; 2-turn discount to competitor Stevanato, 6-turn discount to competitor West
Assumed ~€150mm in normalized FCF
Risks
Vials destocking proves more persistent than expected
All of the primary pharma packaging competitors have called out headwinds in recent quarters from destocking in bulk vials
COVID vaccines drove a huge increase in demand for vials; many/most customers stockpiled as a result and are now sitting on excess inventory
For instance, SCHOTT Pharma just reported a 7% decline in its Drug Containment Solutions segment, primarily as a result of this destocking
The general expectation seems to be that destocking headwinds should abate after 2024 1H, however, most of the competitors have also acknowledged they don’t have full visibility into customer inventory levels; it is also unclear whether customers will go back to pre-COVID levels of inventory or will carry permanently higher levels going forward
Once SCHOTT and/or competitors signal the end of the destocking is in sight, it could remove a meaningful overhang on the stock
GLP-1 momentum stalls
I do not hold a position with the issuer such as employment, directorship, or consultancy. I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.
Catalyst
Destocking headwinds abate. Improvement in FCF. Improved visibility. Valn gap with Stevanato dissipates.
Are you sure you want to close this position SCHOTT Pharma AG & Co. KGaA ?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Flag SCHOTT Pharma AG & Co. KGaA for Removal
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea SCHOTT Pharma AG & Co. KGaA for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You Cannot Submit Message ... Yet
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are
1 way you can get the privilage.
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.