2013 | 2014 | ||||||
Price: | 2.21 | EPS | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
Shares Out. (in M): | 230 | P/E | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
Market Cap (in $M): | 508 | P/FCF | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
Net Debt (in $M): | 53 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 561 | TEV/EBIT | 0.0x | 0.0x |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Rentech, Inc (RTK) presents an opportunity to purchase a collection of undervalued assets with a path toward unlocking intrinsic value off 100% upside. RTK’s 60% stake in publicly traded master limited partnership Rentech Nitrogen Partners, LP (RNF) more than covers RTK’s entire enterprise value and RNF itself is significantly undervalued. Further, management’s transition from black belt capital destroyers to semi-shareholder friendly over the past two years brings a needed and unappreciated catalyst. I recommend an outright long position in RTK, though hedging out RNF creates an alternatively attractive negative stub.
Sum of the Parts Valuation:
RTK stub value based on RNF at current mkt price |
RTK value based on RNF at fair market value |
||||||
Shares |
Value |
Value per RTK share |
Value |
Value per RTK share |
|||
RTK market value of equity |
229.8 |
$507.9 |
$2.21 |
$507.9 |
$2.21 |
||
RTK cap structure pro forma for Fulghum Fibres |
|||||||
RTK corp cash excluding RNF (3/31/13) |
($85.3) |
($0.37) |
($85.3) |
($0.37) |
|||
Proceeds from Natchez MS land |
($9.0) |
($0.04) |
($9.0) |
($0.04) |
|||
Cash price to acquire Fulghum Fibres |
$53.0 |
$0.23 |
$53.0 |
$0.23 |
|||
Debt assumed with Fulghum Fibres |
$59.0 |
$0.26 |
$59.0 |
$0.26 |
|||
Investment in Wood Pellet mill equity and debt |
$35.0 |
$0.15 |
$35.0 |
$0.15 |
|||
Pro forma net debt |
$52.7 |
$0.23 |
$52.7 |
$0.23 |
|||
Enterprise value |
$560.6 |
$2.44 |
$560.6 |
$2.44 |
|||
SOTP valuation |
Shares |
Value |
Value per RTK share |
Value |
Value per RTK share |
||
RNF shares owned by RTK |
23.3 |
$718.6 |
$3.13 |
$1,165.0 |
$5.07 |
||
EBITDA |
multiple |
||||||
Fulghum Fiber |
20.0 |
5.6x |
$112.0 |
$0.49 |
$112.0 |
$0.49 |
|
Wood Pellet business |
7.5 |
4.7x |
$35.3 |
$0.15 |
$35.3 |
$0.15 |
|
Corporate overhead |
(20.0) |
5.0x |
($100.0) |
($0.44) |
($100.0) |
($0.44) |
|
Fair value of RTK equity excluding tax consequences |
$713.1 |
$3.10 |
$1,159.5 |
$5.05 |
|||
Upside |
40.4% |
128.3% |
|||||
Fair value of RTK equity including LT Cap Gain on RNF divestiture |
$569.4 |
$2.48 |
$926.5 |
$4.03 |
|||
Upside |
12.1% |
82.4% |
That RTK trades at a discount to its stake in RNF is not a new phenomenon; in fact, it has been the case since RTK separated RNF into a public MLP in November of 2011. What makes the company attractive today is management’s evolution from capital destroyers to something closer to garden variety overpaid mgmt. For 25 years, RTK had been clean-tech hype company with the (unattainable) goal to “develop and commercialize certain alternative energy technologies.” In 2006, management dumb-lucked its way into the fertilizer business by purchasing an ammonia fertilizer plant for $70mm with the intention of spending another $1bn to create a clean diesel coal gasification plant. The subsequent structural change in US natural gas prices combined with rocketing UAN/Ammonia prices made the plant worth $1.5bn operating in its original purpose as a fertilizer plant. RTK unintentionally found its way to a 20 bagger.
The subsequent IPO of 40% of the fertilizer business into an MLP owned by to the public was the first shareholder friendly event. However, shareholders were still left with management intent on using the MLP distributions from RNF to subsidize its alternative energy R&D. Perhaps they simply realized more personal wealth could be created by focusing on MLP businesses; In February, 2013, the company changed course and announced it would shutter/mothball/sell its entire alternative energy business. Instead of focusing on money losing R&D, management would instead focus its efforts on purchasing profitable energy businesses. RTK announced 2 deals simultaneously three months later in May. RTK acquired a wood chipping business with $20mm of expected EBITDA in 2013 and separately announced it would entering the wood pellet production business with $15mm of EBITDA upon ramp up by 2016.
Milestones on the path to new Rentech:
Rentech Nitrogen, LP
Rentech Nitrogen, LP is a dominant supplier of fertilizer in the corn belt producing UAN, Ammonia, Urea and synthetic ammonium sulfate. RNF owns two plants, though its East Dubuque, IL produces the bulk of the EBITDA. Owing to its location in the middle of the corn belt, RNF receives a premium of approximately $120/ton on Ammonia and $60/ton for UAN over product sourced from the Gulf Coast. Rather than pay for shipping, much of the East Dubuque production is picked up by farmers directly at the plant. Ammonia prices have ranged in the $550-$600 range for the past few years and current prices remain strong in the low $700 range. Natural gas represents about 50% of cost of goods and has been relatively stable at $4. Full year distribution guidance from RNF is $2.60 share for 2013, implying an 8.7% yield. However, 2013 contains a significant amount of noise due both planned and unplanned outages and new supply that will come online toward the end of the year. According to management, the $2.60 guidance includes the impact of $0.65 of planned and unplanned outages. Two expansion projects nearing completion (70K tons of ammonia in IL and 115K tons of ammonium sulfate in Pasadena) are expected to add an additional $0.90 of distribution in 2014 based on March 2013 fertilizer pricing. The expansion projects represent a 23% increase in the East Dubuque plant and a 20% increase in its Pasadena ammonium sulfate plant. Simple math means over $4 per share of distributions in 2014, or a 13.5% yield. The two other pure play MLP ammonia/UAN competitors, Terra Nitrogen Company, LP and CVR Partners, LP trade at 7.3% and 9.2% respectively on 2013 estimates. RNF should trade at a premium due to its close proximity to its customers and its clean financial structure. RNF’s general partner has no incentive distribution rights scheme detracting from potential upside. Further RNF maintains reasonable leverage of 2x 2013 EBITDA pro forma for a $320mm debt issuance in April that fully funds its expansion projects, pays downs its existing $206mm debt, and pushes out the nearest maturity to 2021. Should RNF be priced at 8% yield on a $4 distribution next year, it would be priced at $50 instead of today’s price of $30.
Fulghum Fibres:
Following the long overdue decision to exit alternative energy in February of 2013, RTK shifted its focus to acquiring energy assets providing mid-teens after-tax returns and stable revenue. In May, 2013 RTK announced it would acquire Georgia-based Fulghum Fibres for $112mm. Fulghum’s 32 wood chipping mills represent 70% of the US contract chipping business and operate under long-term fee per ton contracts large paper companies (Weyerhaeuser, Rock-Tenn, Internationl Paper). EBITDA in 2013 is guided to $20mm, in line with 2012. Over the past 25 years, business retention has been 95% and 60% of 2013 EBITDA already contracted through 2017. Management’s long term plan is to acquire or grow the business large enough to create another MLP. The deal is still unseasoned, though the 5.6x EBITDA appears to be a reasonable price, particularly if management can ultimately drop the business into another MLP and create value through tax arbitrage. Sufficed to say this is a dramatic improvement over the proverbial “wood chipping” of shareholder capital in pursuing alternative energy.
Wood Pellets
Simultaneous with announcing the Fulghum Fibres deal, RTK also announced a deal with Graanul Invest to convert two decommissioned fibre board facilities to wood pellet production. The company expects to become the largest supplier of wood pellets in Eastern Canada to the Canadian and European utility market. EBITDA is expected to be $15mm when ramped up, though the timing is a distant 2016. In conjunction with the deal, RTK has secured 10 year take or pay contracts with two utilities and locked up the requisite wood supply. Total equity investment by RTK for 50% (Graanual owns other 50%) is $17.5. An additional $35mm is expected to be financed, though RTK has volunteered to be the bank if a third party doesn’t step up.
Valuation
Admittedly, Rentech, Inc is a messy hodgepodge, which unsurprisingly creates the opportunity. The market has not yet appreciated the transition of the parent from an alternative energy spec burning $70mm per year to an industrial/paper/energy business generating $20mm in EBITDA ($0 EBITDA after corporate). Rentech Nitrogen should be valued near between $45-50 at an 8% yield on 2014 distributions of $3.50-4.00. This equates to $4.50-5.00 per share of value to RTK. Fulghum Fibres should be worth the $0.50 per share they paid. The Wood Pellet business is early to value, though the equity investment is relatively small and will be made over time as the project unfolds. I assume it is worth at least the $0.15 per share investment. Parent net debt (inclusive of Fulghum and Wood Pellet investments) is $0.15 per share. Corporate overhead is running near $20mm, which I back out at 5x for $0.40 per share. The overhead figure should decline as mgmt further reduces the alternative energy headcount which stood at 109 employees 12/31/12. Total value pencils out to of $4.50-$5.00 or 100%+ upside.
Risks
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position RENTECH INC?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea RENTECH INC for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".