2008 | 2009 | ||||||
Price: | 43.49 | EPS | |||||
Shares Out. (in M): | 0 | P/E | |||||
Market Cap (in $M): | 7,440 | P/FCF | |||||
Net Debt (in $M): | 0 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 0 | TEV/EBIT | |||||
Borrow Cost: | NA |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Plum Creek Timber is a very highly valued stock trading at over 40X 2008 consensus EPS & over 33X FCF. Plum Creek Timber has cut estimates twice in the last 9 months. The commodities PCL sells (timber & rural land) are under pressure and the commodities they use (diesel & fertilizer) have risen dramatically. PCL’s main resource, timber, is closely related to housing. Housing accounts for 40% of timber volume and 64% of the timber value (in dollars), with half of that volume being for new homes and half for remodeling. PCL’s stock has defied conventional wisdom and trades near an all-time high.
Business Description:
Plum Creek Timber Co., Inc. is a REIT that owns and manages timberlands in the
We believe that 6 myths regarding the company and asset class exist that are keeping the stock price high:
Myth # 1: The private market value of PCL’s assets are between $50 (company estimate) and as high as $62 (street estimate) a share.
This is untrue for the simple fact that the company could not be sold or liquidated at that price. Much of PCL’s underlying asset value (40%-50%) is in rural land. Rural land is usually used as somebody’s trophy property; consequently it can’t be sold all at once but rather piece by piece to maximize value. PCL admits that it should take 15 years to sell their current rural land holdings. If you were to discount these land sales back to today, you would get a discount of 30%-45% to get actual private market value.
Myth #2: Timber producers are not vulnerable to falling log prices.
Timber companies have the option of letting trees grow instead of cutting them, if prices are not satisfactory. Essentially every business has that same option, it’s called building inventory. Eventually this build up in inventories has to have an effect on prices. The decrease in harvest in part explains the lag in log prices vs. housing, but also indicates that the downturn may last longer than housing. One Caveat- a pine beetle infestation of Canadian timber is forcing them to cut, putting pressure on current prices, but should also decrease their harvests in later years (potentially increasing prices in future years).
Myth #3: Rural land has a correlation to farm land.
With the spike in farm land prices, bulls decided to mine some data. There does seem to be some historical correlation between rural land and farm land, although rural land has lagged recently. Unfortunately, any correlation between rural land and farm land is spurious. In the 1Q call, PCL’s CEO said “I think mother nature decided that trees grow good in some places, and corn grows good in some places and vice versa.”
Myth #4: PCL can arbitrage by selling land in the private market and buying back stock.
This may be true in the short run (PCL is selling 300,000 acres of land to be used for conservation in what appears to be a very attractive deal). We would point out that PCL is a fairly levered (4.3X TTM EBITDA) REIT, this would be a very efficient and highly valued capital structure, plus PCL is the largest land owner on the planet, giving them scale advantages. The fact that they can currently sell land at higher prices than their market valuation is more likely indicative of excessive private market values for timber land than a cheap stock market valuation.
Myth #5: Timber is a renewable asset, which gives Plum Creek a continuous stream of income.
For the most part, this statement is true. However, the return on growing trees can change over time. On PCL’s last call they said that with the spike in fertilizer prices that the IRR of fertilizer application has gone from 15%-18% to 8% to 12%.
Myth #6: Over time Timber land becomes rural land, increasing its value.
This may be true but the process may take decades and even centuries. A recent and bullish Merrill estimate puts PCL’s timber at $1,292 per acre vs. $2,492 for rural land so not even double, not much of a big score considering you may be waiting 100 years for it.
Potential Downside Catalysts:
A drop in timber or rural land prices:
Earnings keep dropping for timber properties, as log prices go down and costs go up, which should put pressure on private market values. For an idea of how over valued timber land is we take Merrill Lynch’s estimates for timber earnings and valuation. If we then assume that a buyer would use 25% debt paying 5% interest, they would get negative earnings and a Price to free cash flow of over 136. We would note that though PCL has been able to sell timber properties for very high prices overall, some of their properties have been sold for the lowest prices in years. The company has said these low prices were due to the properties being lower grade.
Rural land is correlated to housing; the bursting of the housing bubble is starting to take its toll on rural land. In a recent conference, PCL’s CEO Rick Holley noted “The real high value markets like
While some investors may be worried that you will be shorting against a bubble, we would point out that we do not know of any bubble or asset class that has been able to sustain itself in a period of deteriorating earnings. Once again Plum Creek’s CEO says it best, during the June 5th NARET conference in reference to timber lands “I think this will be a buyer’s market some time in the future”.
Declining earnings:
Earnings continue to be under pressure for Plum Creek. PCL has cut guidance twice in the last 9 months, but we do not think they have cut enough. Log prices are clearly under pressure, of note is that PCL has suffered what looks like under a 10% drop in log prices while the industry is down over 20%. The relative strength is due to location, but that could change as the housing crisis spreads.
Rising diesel fuel is also a big problem for PCL. For every dollar change in diesel prices, we estimate a $36 million hit to PCL’s earnings. We do not believe that current, guidance or consensus incorporates diesels recent parabolic run (see exhibit 1 below).
Exhibit 1: Rising Diesel prices (cents per gallon)
Date
Diesel
1/15/2007
248.5
2/15/2007
248.8
3/15/2007
266.7
4/15/2007
283.4
5/15/2007
279.6
6/15/2007
280.8
7/15/2007
286.8
8/15/2007
286.9
9/15/2007
295.3
10/15/2007
307.5
11/15/2007
339.6
12/15/2007
334.1
1/15/2008
330.8
2/15/2008
337.7
3/15/2008
388.1
4/15/2008
408.4
5/15/2008
442.5
6/23/2008
464.8
We have forecast 2008 EPS of $0.78 & 2009 EPS of $0.71 (see exhibit 2 below) that compares to the current consensus of $1.15 & $1.39. While our estimates may look overly pessimistic on the surface, we believe our inputs to be conservative. We estimate that Timber production will be down 3% YoY in 2008 with prices down just 2.5%. Timber costs will be down with production with the exception of diesel costs where we see a $1.00 a gallon increase in 2008 (see exhibit 1). Real estate revenue coming in at $330 million (the mid point of guidance), manufacturing operating at breakeven (despite a miserable 1Q). In 2009 we have timber production and prices both down 1%, Diesel fuel up $0.50 (reflecting diesel fuel staying flat from today’s prices), real estate revenue down $20 million (reflecting the slowing environment heading into the second half of 2008), and manufacturing rebounding to $20 million in EBIT.
Exhibit 2: PCL Income statement | |||||||||
2005 | 2006 | YoY% | 2007 | YoY% | 2008E | YoY% | 2009E | YoY% | |
Revenue | |||||||||
Timber | 764 | 807 | 5.6% | 782 | -3.1% | 740 | -5.4% | 725 | -2.0% |
Real Estate | 292 | 308 | 5.5% | 402 | 30.5% | 330 | -17.9% | 310 | -6.1% |
Manufacturing | 504 | 493 | -2.2% | 471 | -4.5% | 440 | -6.6% | 460 | 4.5% |
Other | 16 | 19 | 18.8% | 20 | 5.3% | 21 | 5.0% | 23 | 9.5% |
Total | 1,576 | 1,627 | 3.2% | 1,675 | 3.0% | 1,531 | -8.6% | 1,518 | -0.8% |
Expenses | |||||||||
Costs of Goods Sold: | |||||||||
Timber | 418 | 487 | 16.5% | 523 | 7.4% | 541 | 3.5% | 553 | 2.1% |
Real Estate | 152 | 126 | -17.1% | 144 | 14.3% | 139 | -3.5% | 131 | -6.1% |
Manufacturing | 463 | 455 | -1.7% | 454 | -0.2% | 440 | -3.1% | 440 | 0.0% |
Other | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 0.0% |
Total | 1,036 | 1,071 | 3.4% | 1,124 | 4.9% | 1,123 | -0.1% | 1,126 | 0.3% |
SG&A | 97 | 113 | 16.5% | 127 | 12.4% | 131 | 3.1% | 132 | 0.8% |
Total Expenses | 1,133 | 1,184 | 4.5% | 1,251 | 5.7% | 1,254 | 0.3% | 1,258 | 0.3% |
Other Operating income | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Operating Income | 448 | 447 | -0.2% | 424 | -5.1% | 276 | -34.8% | 259 | -6.1% |
Interest Expense | 109 | 133 | 22.0% | 147 | 10.5% | 143 | -2.7% | 140 | -2.1% |
Income before taxes | 339 | 314 | -7.4% | 277 | -11.8% | 133 | -51.9% | 119 | -10.4% |
Provision for Income taxes | 8 | 13 | -3 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Net Income | 331 | 301 | -9.1% | 280 | -7.0% | 133 | -52.4% | 119 | -10.4% |
EPS | $1.79 | $1.66 | $1.60 | $0.78 | $0.71 | ||||
Diluted Share Count | 184.6 | 180.9 | 175 | 170 | 168 | ||||
Cash flow: | |||||||||
DD&A | 139 | 139 | 140 | ||||||
Capex | -84 | -95 | -98 | ||||||
Free Cash Flow | 335 | 177 | 161 | ||||||
FCF per share | $1.91 | $1.04 | $0.96 | ||||||
Real estate basis sold | 80 | 83 | 78 | ||||||
FCF + real estate sale | 415 | 260 | 239 | ||||||
FCF per share + real estate | $2.37 | $1.53 | $1.42 |
Potential for a dividend cut:
Clearly right now PCL is not earning their dividend of $1.68 per share, at the current consensus of $1.15 in EPS; they would not even get there with FCF. Despite the lack of FCF to support the dividend, the consensus seems to think that the dividend is safe; we disagree and see an increasing chance of a dividend cut. The only way PCL is able to cover their current dividend is if you count the basis on land sales, which is really the return of capital not return on capital. If our estimates are correct they will no longer be able to cover the dividend even with this flimsy measure of cash flow.
Management will maintain the dividend if they see the downturn as temporary. We note that management’s tone has changed in recent quarters; they used to talk about the housing downturn as very temporary but now are more uncertain. Management used to talk about the strength of rural land but at the NAREIT conference they talked more about the hope of cellulosic ethanol, which seems to be very pie in the sky. Of course management could continue to fund the dividend through timber land sales but as we outlined above that practice could be in danger.
Valuation:
We value PCL’s timber assets at 13X 2007 EBIT, for rural land we used a DCF and assumed it would take 15 years to sell with a 10% discount rate & 4% growth rate, we value the natural resources segment at over 11X EBIT, and we value the manufacturing business at $250 million which is close to 7X peak EBIT. We come up with $27.45 per share for PCL. Not only are we awarding high multiples off of peak earnings, but by counting timber and rural land we are actually double counting, consequently, we think there could be even further downside in PCL shares. Our target price for PCL is $27.50 per share.
Exhibit 3: Valuation | ||
Value | Valuation Method | |
Timber | 2,782 | 13X 2007 EBIT |
Manufacturing | 266 | 7X peak EBIT |
Natural Resources | 200 | 11X EBIT |
Real Estate | 3,923 | DCF |
Cash | 118 | |
Subtotal | 7,273 | |
Debt | 2,578 | |
Equity Value | 4,695 |
|
Value Per share | $27.45 |
Other points on PCL:
PCL’s sale of real estate is not sustainable for ever.
REITs could be under pressure as higher yielding securities make them look less attractive.
PCL has a yield of just 3.6% vs. the Vanguard REIT Index’s 4.75%.
The value of PCL’s rural land is imprecise at best; PCL uses regressions to estimate value not appraisals.
Risks:
Continued successful timber asset sales by PCL.
A turnaround in housing.
PCL is able to reaccelerate the sales of their rural land.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position Plum Creek Timber?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea Plum Creek Timber for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".