Nordstrom Inc. is trading with
one of the lowest P/E’s in retail (11.5x consensus). Using reasonable assumptions, its shares should be worth
closer to $70-$80 per share (~2x the current share price) given the company’s
low concept penetration, high business quality, accelerating new store growth,
aggressive share repurchases, earnings growth potential and industry leading
economics--ROA of 14%, ROIC of 20% and ROE of 28% (all the more impressive
given the fact that JWN owns 70% of its real estate).
Nordstrom Inc. is one of the
nation’s largest upscale apparel and shoe retailers. The company sells clothes, shoes and accessories through 101
Nordstrom stores and ~50 outlet/clearance stores (Nordstron Rack) in 27
states. The company also sells
online and via catalog. The Nordstrom family owns about 20% of the company’s
stock (economic and voting) and closely supervises the chain (Blake Nordstrom,
a 4th generation descendant of John Nordstrom, who started the
company back in 1901 is the current president and four other family members
hold senior management positions).
JWN has made tremendous strides over the last several years,
particularly after a 4 year stint (beginning in 1995) of outside “professional
management” that was brought in to
help run the company, which resulted in slumping sales and profitability far
below industry averages. In 2000, the outside management members were ousted
and the Nordstrom family was back in charge, with 4th generation
Blake Nordstrom appointed as President and Bruce Nordstrom (Blake’s father)
came out of retirement to take on the Chairman’s role. The Nordstroms’ led a dramatic
turnaround of the company and beginning in 2002, invested heavily in IT to
develop a perpetual inventory
system that has enabled merchant teams (which became more decentralized)
to more accurately forecast sales trends and to better track/plan store level
inventory and expenses. In 2004,
JWN also put into place a new POS system that includes a tool called Personal
Book, which allows salespeople to tailor service to the needs of each customer
by organizing and tracking customer preferences, purchases, and contact
information. The result has been a
dramatic improvement in sales productivity and profitability. Sales per square foot has grown to over
$400 currently vs. $317 in 2002, and over the same timeframe, comps have been
positive, ranging from 4%-8% (will likely be around 4% for FY07), EBITDA
margins have expanded to around 14% from 7.4% and return on invested capital
increased to ~20% from 7%.
JWN’s equity price, similar to
several other retailers, is down 27% YTD and began to slide in late September
(when it was around $51/share—was at a high of nearly $60 in February) due to
economic/recession fears, above-plan inventories at the start of the fall
selling season, and warm weather in September which dampened apparel
sales. The company successfully
worked through the excess inventory by taking additional markdowns during the
3Q. 3Q07 results
actually ended up being better than expected, with comps up 2.2%, gross margins down only 40 bps on the
markdowns, and SG&A as a percent of sales actually decreasing 70 bps (to
28.7%). After inventory per square
foot growth of 7% during 2Q, Nordstrom was able to ratchet this down to 2% in
the 3Q (below comp store sales growth).
EPS for the Q ended up at $0.59, above the revised guidance of around
$0.50 and 13.5% ahead of last year.
This is actually a pretty good achievement given the inventory issues
going into the Q and further provides evidence that JWN is a far better managed
company today as a result of the IT, inventory management and merchandising
improvements over the past 4 years.
In November, comps rebounded to a strong 8.7% (2x expectations), as
weather shifted in its favor (stronger sales of warmer clothing), the company
benefited from a calendar shift (extra week in the measurement period) and
enjoyed very strong sales (far above the average 9% comp) in designer
merchandise across all categories, particularly in women’s shoes and
accessories. Because of the
calendar shift, Dec. comps will be down ~4-5%, with a flat comp expected for
all of 4Q (which has one less week vs. last year). Since the 3Q and November sales results, the stock bounced
fro $31 to $36, but it still represents good long-term value.
Now that JWN has enjoyed
success in its inventory/merchandising execution, management feels that it can
now focus on more rapid expansion for what is really an under-penetrated
concept catering to customers with average incomes above $100k per year (above
Macy’s/Bloomingdale, JCP, Sears Dillards $45k-80k) but below Saks, Neiman
Marcus, and Barneys ($200+k). As
one of the major purveyors of “affordable luxury”, JWN distinguishes itself
from the rest of the department store fray by emphasizing high quality,
differentiated merchandise, personalized customer service, and a consistent
upscale shopping experience across the entire store base. Anyone who has shopped at a Nordstrom
realizes that the experience is truly a cut above shopping at Macy’s or even
the average Bloomingdale's both in terms of merchandise quality and customer
service (which is right on par with the likes of Saks, Neiman, and
Barneys). In addition to expanding
retail square footage, JWN plans to drive sales growth by continuing to focus
on three key initiatives: 1)
developing targeted merchandising strategies in women’s apparel; 2) enhance the
women’s designer business-- i.e. carry more upscale items similar to Saks and
Neiman, particularly in apparel and accessories (the latter has performed
tremendously well this year with strong double digit comps that appear to be
accelerating in 3rd and 4th quarters); 3) creating a more
integrated, consistent merchandise offering across the full line stores and
direct sales (internet/catalog) channels.
Investment Positives:
JWN’s renowned service is a
competitive advantage: JWN has developed a reputation
for some of the best customer service in the retail industry, with an almost
legendary easy-return policy (customer returning automobile tires and getting
his money back—which according to John Nordstrom, is actually true), personal
touches such as thank-you notes from employees, employees cheering customers on
the opening day of new stores, and pleasant shopping atmospheres complete with
live piano music, restaurants, espresso bars and some stores even featuring day
spas. Other retailers routinely
cite Nordstrom as being among the best of breed in customer service.
JWN has plenty of growth
potential: With only 101 full line and 50
Nordstrom Rack stores in 27 states (West Coast, Mid-Atlantic, South and
Midwest). This is a relatively
small footprint compared with other department stores. Now that JWN has improved its
profitability though its IT/JIT initiatives, the company feels it has the
platform to meaningfully accelerate growth and intends to spend nearly $3BN
over the next 5 years to open approximately 28 full line stores and 12-15 Rack
stores and remodel nearly 70 of its existing stores. Three years ago, the company identified 50 target markets it
would like to be in, and thus far, approximately only 10 of those markets have
been opened/scheduled. These
expansion plans will result in “built in” growth of square footage to the tune
of ~5% per year over the next 5 years (vs. ~2% historically), which can be
completely funded with internal cash flow generation. Assuming that comps average 2%-3% per annum over the
next 5 years (below 5-yr average), JWN should enjoy top line growth of 7%-8%
per year, which on stable/improving margins, would be leveraged to low-mid
teens digit earnings growth (and mid-teems w/share repurchases).
Cost structure as an advantage
and management expects further improvement: In contrast to much of the
retail/department store sector (save for the high end), JWN has a relatively
more variable cost structure because its salespeople’s compensation is 100%
based on commissions.
Approximately 30% of total costs comprise of SG&A expense, and about
45% of SG&A is represented by
sales commissions. Couple this
with COGS ex depreciation and occupancy costs comprising 60% of the cost
structure, and you have a cost structure that is approximately 70% variable--of
course not all of COGS is truly ‘variable’ because if sales slow down, the
company will have to take more markdowns which will eat into gross margins. Notwithstanding this, JWN does enjoy a
more variable cost structure vs. most of its retail peers which should help the
company better weather a potential recession. Also strides in systems-driven inventory management
improvements and better fashion merchandising has enabled JWN to expand gross
margins and better leverage SG&A.
On a low single-digit comp, management believes that margins can
continue to expand (albeit at a more modest pace vs. historically), with a
long-term goal of getting SG&A as a % of total sales to low 26% range (from
~27% currently) and continued modest improvement in gross margins (~25-50 bps
over next few years).
Accelerating share repurchases: JWN recently raised debt (net
$700MM) to conduct an accelerated share repurchase program. In 2006, the board authorized a $1.5BN
share repurchase program (~$7500MM has been repurchased to date under the
program) and in Nov. 2007, the board further expanded the program by an
additional $1BN to be completed by the year-end 2009. JWN has plenty of balance sheet capacity to conduct these
share repurchases (debt/EBITDA is ~ 2.0x) and after 2009, it should have the
ability to conduct further repurchases of $700MM-$800MM per annum by modestly
increasing debt (but maintaining current
2.0x debt/EBITDA level) for total share repurchase of approximately $3.5-$4BN over the next 5
years). With a market cap of
$8.35BN, $4BN of share repurchases would take out 48% of the market cap at
today’s prices. Moreover, given
the Nordstrom family’s ownership of the stock (at 20%), share repurchases as a
% of outstanding float is very high nearly 60%),which at least from a technical
basis, should help support the share price over time (albeit this plays a minor
role in my thesis).
Valuation:
|
|
Earnings growth |
Past 5 Years |
|
Earnings Growth |
Next 5 Yrs |
|
|
|
Nordstrom |
Macy's |
Saks |
Kohl's |
Dillard's |
Costco |
Target |
Wal-Mart |
Tiffany's |
TJX |
|
11.5 |
10.8 |
31.7 |
11.9 |
26.2 |
20.0 |
13.5 |
14.0 |
17.3 |
14.0 |
|
17% |
5% |
0% |
19% |
2% |
10% |
14% |
14% |
8% |
10% |
|
16% |
8% |
11% |
17% |
20% |
12% |
14% |
12% |
14% |
13% |
|
20% |
9% |
10% |
18% |
4% |
13% |
13% |
15% |
14% |
24% |
|
28% |
13% |
11% |
18% |
4% |
16% |
19% |
20% |
16% |
30% |
|
Source of earnings growth and ROIC/ROE Estimates: Value Line
JWN is trading at a meaningful
discount to other retailers, some of which will be more susceptible to
variations in the economic cycle given their focus on moderate-income consumers
(ie. Kohl’s, Macy’s, Sears, Bon-Ton, JC Penney) and nearly all of which have
lower long-term revenue/earnings growth prospects, ROIC, and ROE. JWN’s ROIC is particularly impressive
given that it owns 70% of its retail square footage and it maintains its credit
card receivables securitization program on balance sheet (net investment of
~430MM on total receivables of $1.6BN backing $1.2BN in secured debt). Against the average of the comps, JWN
is trading among the cheapest with a P/E of 11.5 of FY08 consensus earnings (6x
turns below the group average), yet with earnings growth, ROIC, and ROE far
higher vs. the rest of the comps and with one of the strongest balance sheets
in the industry (rated A-/Baa1, highest among all dept. stores and 4th
highest among all US rated retailers
with TGT, WMT, and COST being higher)
JWN is also trading cheap to
its long-term (15 year) historical
forward P/E of approximately 17.0-17.5.
Also underpinning the
valuation is the company’s real estate ownership, where it owns 70% of its
retail square footage. Looking at
the cities in which the stores are located as well as the malls/shopping
areas (all prime, upscale shopping
destinations), you can safely assume a valuation of $200/sq ft for owned retail
selling space (14.6mm sq. feet) and $100/sq ft for the 6 owned distribution
centers (~1mm sq feet ) for a total owned R/E value of ~$3BN. Given that most of JWN’s leased stores
have been built prior to 2000 (many from the 1970s and 1980s) and many of which
are under long term leases, you can reasonably assume a fair market re-rental
rate of $2-4 per square foot (ie. the leases psf that JWN pays can likely be
re-leased at $2- $4 psf more and likely higher) at a 7% cap rate equates to
another $200-$400MM of below market lease real estate value for a total R/E
value of~ $3.4MM. Total R/E value
makes up about 41% of JWN’s current market cap and 33% of EV.
Looking 5 years out, you can
see the limited downside (and vast potential upside) when you consider that of the current $8.35BN market cap,
$4.0BN may be ‘taken out’ through repurchases (assuming current stock prices),
real estate value will have increased (through new store openings) by $1.1BN+,
and you would be effectively
owning a company (assuming today’s stock price ) with a market cap of $4.35BN,
which owns ~ $4.5BN worth of real estate, and generated after-tax earnings of
over $1BN by 2012). Of course not
all share repurchases will be executed at today’s market prices, however it
illustrates that the current share price level relative to the cash flow
generating ability and projected real estate value makes little sense.
Projections/DCF analysis:
Below are the assumptions for
how I get to an intrinsic value per share of $75-$80+.
Revenue growth: 5% square footage growth for next 5
years + average comp of 2% per year (much lower vs. past 5 years of mid-high
single digits) for total average revenue growth of 7%. All square footage growth can be
internally funded with cash flow.
Margins: No improvement in
gross margins (management assumes modest improvement over time), remaining at
about 41% of sales. SG&A
margins expected to improve to 26% by 2012 from ~27% currently (in line w/
mgmt’ projections) as larger store base will result in better leverageing fixed
expenses (particularly in Corp, G&A, overhead, distribution).
Interest rates &
Taxes: Similar to historical
levels.
Share repurchases of
$750-$800MM per year at assumed prices of $40-$60 per share over next 5
years. Share repurchases assumed
to be funded with debt (beyond 2009) so as to maintain the company’s
debt/EBITDA ratio at 2.0x
Result: EPS grows from approximately $2.96 per
share in FY08 to $5.25/share in 2012. Applying a 17.0x multiple (avg. 15 year
historical multiple of JWNs earnings, and in line/below other comparable growth
retailers seen today) on $5.25 of earnings = $90 per share. Discounting this at 10% yields a
valuation of $76/share. Assuming a
9% discount rate (not unreasonable given that JWN’s 30 year bonds trade at a
yield of 7% + 200 bps = 9%) = $80/share.
Assume the above, with a 15x
terminal multiple (same as long-term S&P 500 multiple, even hough JWN’s top line growth will likely
exceed that of the S&P given the relative under-penetration of the concept)
at a 10% discount rate, intrinsic value/share = $69.
Sensitivities & Upside/Downside analysis:
1) Greater comp growth: Assumed long-term comp store growth of
4% , which is lower vs. recent history of mid-high single digits and higher vs.
original assumption of 2% combined w/ planned 5% square footage growth = $85 at
10% discount rate.
2) Recession case:
With strong evidence that we may be headed into a recession in
FY08-FY09, JWN would unlikely be completely immune despite its focus on
higher income customers who
theoretically would feel less pinched by a recession in comparison to the
customer bases of JWN’s other retail peers. There is the counter-argument, however that since JWN
focuses more on “affordable luxury” vs. the higher-end luxury chains Saks,
Neiman, and Barney’s (incomes over $200-$250k), it will still be susceptible to
a cash-strapped (and less wealthy with the popping of the R/E bubble) customer.
While recessions don’t last
forever (and JWN has survived many of them) if sales/margins become more
strained, earnings/cash flow will be lower and the company will likely
repurchase fewer shares, all of whichwhich will affect intrinsic value (particularly
the ‘near term’ cash flows discounted to the present). For companies like JWN who have solid
balance sheets, are able to properly manage inventories, and continue to expand
market share during a downturn may actually emerge from a recession even
stronger. Nonetheless, it is still
worthwhile to look downside 2 year “recession case” on the intrinsic value
calculation with the following
assumptions:
--Comps decline by 2% in FY08
and 4% in 09 for 2 year comp decline of 6% (worst comps JWN has had in past
recession was down ~3%). Company
still has enough internally generated funds to expand its square footage by at
least 4% per year (vs. 5%
initially assumed), which would effectively offset the negative comps (ie.
overall sales revenue would be flat).
--Gross margins contract by
100- 200 bps on heavier discounting (worse than prior downturns)
--SG&A as % of sales
remain flat as 45% of SG&A expense are salespeople commissions.
--Inventory days on hand
increase by 8% as sales slow (reduces operating and free cash flow).
--SG&A margins stay the
same at ~27% as 45% of SG&A
expense consists of sales commissions
--Income generated from the
credit card portfolio currently $250MM per year) is reduced to by 50% over a 2
yr time frame because of charge-offs (pretty draconian assumption as JWN has
never witnessed such charge-offs in prior downturns).
-- Beginning in 2010, prior
assumptions regarding the company’s top line growth growth, margin expansion,
share repurchase activity, and leverage remain intact.
Result: EPS in 2008 declines by 25% to
$2.30/are, FY09 EPS goes down to $2.25/share and recovers to $4.50/share in
2012. Applying a 10% discount rate
with a terminal multiple (2012) of 17, yields a price of $65/share (nearly 2x
the current price).
Risks:
--Consumer led recession could
stall top line growth, reducing cash flow and amount for share repurchases.
--Real-estate wealth effect
may have disproportionately boosted sales of “affordable luxury” items—however,
the sale of branded items in all categories (an initiative that JWN has been
expanding) has never been stronger (as seen in the 3Q results), and JWN’s move
to carry more designer/branded items should capitalize on long-term trends of
higher income consumers moving up the quality spectrum.
--Exposure to Nordstrom card
and Co-branded VISA card receivables quality. Company as recently seen an increase in delinquency rates,
which are currently 2.4% and above the ~2% long-term average. Nonetheless, this is still below the
rates seen in the rest of the industry currently and are also consistent with
the rates that JWN experienced prior to the bankruptcy law change in 2005. Management has expressed confidence in
the quality of the portfolio, as over 90% of JWN credit card spending is done
by prime or super-prime customers.
Also, ~50% of the credit card portfolio pays in full every month, as
customers mostly use Nordstrom card for convenience and benefits (i.e. the
fashion rewards program). The
credit card receivables are secured by debt and are well capitalized on a
stand-alone basis ($430MM equity
cushion on $1.6BN in receivables or 25%) and historically during past
recessions, the portfolio has far outperformed industry averages considering the
prime/super prime nature of the customer base.
1) Accelerated “built in” store growth of an under-penetrated concept
3) Improvements in inventory and merchandising will continue to drive growth and should differentiate JWN vs. many other retailers in a recession
4) Margin expansion as square footage growth results in better leveraging of expenses
5) Continued strong ROIC vs. other retailers should warrant a premium vs a discount valuation.
6) Given inventory cleanup in 3Q with minimal damage (i.e. double digit EPS growth), in-line inventories/lower markdowns going will likely result in 4Q surprise to the upside.