2015 consensus EPS estimates for DNOW are down 35% in the last 3 months and 2016/17/18 EPS estimates have all been cut in half. I would agree that the 2016/17/18 estimates of $1.05/1.08/1.29 are probably... login to read the rest
That's fine, but there are other and better energy service companies with similarly clean balance sheets that will have opportunities to strengthen their position and they are getting nowhere near the credit DNOW is getting... login to read the rest
I haven't learned anything to dissuade me from my believe that DNOW is significantly overvalued. I agree with everdeen about the investor base.
For anyone who is unclear about the impact of the energy downturn on... login to read the rest
I agree 100% on the valuation differential. I think DNOW got some of the spinoff sheen and the investor base evaluating it is likely very different from that of MRC, even now.
I was just talking... login to read the rest
A 40% premium LTM EBITDA multiple and 100% premium forward P/E seems quite large despite the difference in leverage and clearly you know that these type of businesses generate significant FCF during any slowdown so... login to read the rest
Are you adjusting for the very significant leverage difference? It's probably more illustrative to look at the divergence in EV terms, which is likely far smaller. MRC is levered 3x EBITDA, DNOW has a little
Snarfy, any thoughts on the divergence of stock price performance to MRC? Even yesterday, when energy and MRC took a beating, DNOW was up. Over a five day, one month, three month, and six month... login to read the rest
The CEO's purchase was only $274k. I am undeterred. I didn't see a single thing in the earnings report that made me question my thesis. If anything, the results were much worse than I could... login to read the rest
Revenue 12.9% below consensus; $952mm vs. $1,094mm, and down 11.0% YoY
EBITDA 20.7% below consensus; $49mm vs. $62mm, with a 5.1% margin vs. 5.2% a year ago - still light years away from the 8% EBITDA... login to read the rest
Thanks for your questions.
The incremental costs of being a standalone company were pegged in the Information Statement at $45 million. That number seems high. They need to add ~100 people to staff functions like Treasury... login to read the rest
I can't believe I forgot to mention this. Management is not receiving options with strike prices based on a mechanism like the VWAP for the first 30 days trading, and their old NOV options are... login to read the rest
Thanks for your comments. I can't completely dismiss the point you make (accretion is accretion after all), but there are a couple areas where I would push back.
First, MRC also tells me they want to... login to read the rest
I was also surprised by the level of interest in the company during the roadshow, but I think you're underestimating the potential for accretive M&A, which arguably justifies the premium P/E valuation vs MRC. DNOW... login to read the rest
Are you sure you want to close this position NOW Inc.?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Flag NOW Inc. for Removal
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea NOW Inc. for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You Cannot Submit Message ... Yet
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are
1 way you can get the privilage.
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.