Competitors in the H&F business include Farmers Union Mutual, North Star Mutual, American Family, and Nationwide Mutual. While these companies may have greater resources and deeper penetration in other markets, none have the same established presence and trust in North Dakota and the closely surrounding Midwest.
Crop
NODK provides crop hail and multi-peril crop insurance through Nodak (North Dakota), American West (South Dakota), and Battle Creek (Nebraska). “Crop hail insurance” is a private insurance product that provides protection against losses to farmers’ crops due to hail damage. “Multi-peril crop insurance”, on the other hand, is a federal program that protects against crop yield losses from all types of natural causes including drought, excessive moisture, freeze, and disease. Most crop insurance sold includes a “crop-yield” and “crop-revenue” element, protecting against both reduced land productivity (yield) and a decline in crop prices (revenue).
In 1980, Congress expanded the federal crop insurance program to cover more crops and regions of the country, and it permitted private sector insurers to market and administer federal insurance policies in exchange for the opportunity to earn a profit while bearing a portion of the insurance risk. Congress also authorized a premium subsidy for farmers and ranchers. In combination, these actions led to rapid and widespread adoption of crop insurance (acres insured grew from 26 million in 1980 to 100 million in 1990 and 380 million in 2019).
Federally-run multi-peril crop insurance is a complicated business. Simply stated, the price for multi-peril policies is fixed by the Risk Management Agency (a division of the USDA), and private insurance companies (like NODK) market the product, manage the policies, and share a portion of the risk/reward on a sliding scale. NODK and other private insurers who market and service the policies are reimbursed by the government for a portion of their costs (around 12-13% in NODK’s case).
The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) provides reinsurance for the industry should extreme losses occur. NODK also maintains additional reinsurance on top of the FCIC’s. NODK’s max loss ratio on crop insurance is 105%, a level which has only been reached once since 2003 (in 2011). NODK retains weather-related losses from catastrophic events of $10 million, with reinsurance coverage in excess of retention of $117 million. Due to extensive reinsurance protection, both from the federally-supported FCIC and private third-parties, I believe catastrophic tail risk is minimal.
The government’s expense reimbursement program combined with risk-management reinsurance support has historically made crop insurance a low risk, high return business. A change in government policy, although not predicted, could dampen the attractiveness of this segment and is a risk to consider (although a small one for NODK in my view as further explained below).