Contrarian opportunity in underappreciated, stable FCF stream in the most-hated sector of 2017, consumer retail. Mature, market-leading niche retail concept with scale advantages, relative immunity from broader economic trends and minimal threat from online disintermediation, with attractive margins, high FCF generation and 20% avg ROIC, trading at a 12% FCF yield. Company is nearing the end of a 10-year deleveraging path post Bain/BX ownership (2006 LBO) that has taken ND / EBITDA from over 7.0x to 2.8x currently, and we believe a change in capital allocation priorities can drive significant gains in equity value. Significant FCF generation plus free upside option on comps improvement (as market currently pricing in no-growth scenario) yields exceptional risk/reward profile. $30+ PT (50% upside) on 8x 2018 EBITDA or a 9% FCF yield.
Business summary
Largest arts and crafts retailer in NA, with 1,367 stores in US and Canada. Non-mall based destination retailer with strong seasonal assortments that drive traffic.
$30B+ Arts & Crafts Industry grows roughly with HH formation and exhibits very low correlation with the broader economy (crafting purchases less-discretionary than most retail). During the last recession (2008/2009 years), industry sales fell -15%/-1% and MIK comps were -4.6%/+0.2%.
Tactile nature of arts and crafts (in-store experience critical for customers) and low per-transaction economics ($3 AUP and $21 avg ticket) provide advantages vs online/shipping-based models. Moreover, large number of highly diverse SKUs (stores hold same number of SKUs as HD with 20% of the floor space), low inventory turnover, and infrequent per-customer transactions (2.5x / year) represent a barrier to entry (high upfront working capital requirements) for new entrants, even WMT and AMZN.
Stable business model with exceptional economics for a retailer (5-yr avg GM% / EBITDA% / ROIC = 40% / 17% / 20%) and strong FCF, driven by minimal WC requirements for maintenance/growth and low capex (2.2% sales)
Mature concept with LT growth algorithm of +LSD unit growth and comps +1-2%
Scale advantages (MIK > 2x size of next two comps combined) + new China direct-sourcing benefits from Lamrite West deal (2016) enhances buying power on low-ticket items
Deep and growing private label offering (57% sales are PL) provides GM% tailwind (every 1% PL sales = 10bps to GM)
SG&A leverage on comps +1.5% creates low-threshold for operating leverage. Minimal risk from labor inflation as MIK already pays well-above min wage nationwide ($12/hr avg in-store)
Border Tax risks are minor – MIK directly imports 35% of COGS and can offset margin pressure with pricing. 20% Border Tax can be fully-offset with +LSD price increase across all SKUs. Given the $3 ASP, we think the pricing side of the story is an underappreciated risk management option on tax changes.
Comps trajectory
MIK is a mature concept in a mature category, so comp profile has always been modest. 5-yr avg comps from 2011-2015 = 2.2%.
2016 comp weakness is what drove stock sell-off (along with general retail sector pressure from a weak holiday season + border tax risks). Comps turned negative in 2H16 as company cycled several quarters of above-avg growth (2015 comps +3.2% ex-FX, with 2H15 comps +4% ex-FX) driven by a single successful product (adult coloring books), the custom framing business (10% of sales and highest-ticket items in the store) remained weak, promotional intensity increased among smaller competitors, and MIK executed a major flex-space change across a number of stores.
Upside to current low 2017 comps expectations (street +1%) most likely comes in 2H17 = no coloring book headwind + no election slow-down + no seasonal headwinds (from flex space changes) + implementation of EDV program on basic craft items in-store with no promotions + flow-thru of new, higher-spending loyalty program customers (enrollments 2x plan in 2016 at 14m users).
Low FCF leverage to comps trajectory provides downside support = every +/- 1% comps = +/- $52m in sales, $9m in EBITDA and $5m to FCF. Even at 0% comps in 2017, we believe business can generate ~$860m of EBITDA (trading at 7.4x) and $435m of FCF (11.3% yield to equity) going forward
Capital structure catalyst
MIK has dedicated close to 90% of the $1.1B of FCF generated to deleveraging the balance sheet the last 3 years
Current leverage sits at 2.8x ND/EBITDA (4.5x lease-adj), within the target range of 2.5-3.0x set by mgmt
MIK has 5.7x interest coverage as of Q416, and no near-term maturities (5.875% senior sub notes due 2020)
June 15th Investor Day (the 1st since June 2014 IPO) likely to provide new capital allocation catalyst – we believe company may significantly lift its current $300m+ buyback authorization and could effectively repo $1B worth of stock the next 2 years
Valuation and assumptions
Base case = $30 stock (~50% upside) at 8x 2018 EBITDA or 10% FCF yield. Assumptions = +1% unit growth, +1% comp growth, 16.3% EBTIDA margins in 2018 = $895m EBITDA and $468m of FCF. Assumes $800m share repo at $24 avg price and 162m shares out by yr-end 2018.
Bull case = $35 stock (~70% upside) at 8.5x 2018 EBITDA or 9% FCF yield. Assumptions = +1% unit growth, +1.5-2% comp growth, 16.6% EBITDA margins in 2018 = $920m EBITDA and $484m of FCF. Assumes $950m share repo at $24 avg price and 156m shares out by yr-end 2018.
Bear case = $25 stock (~25% upside) at 7.5x 2018 EBITDA or 11% FCF yield. Assumptions = +1% unit growth, +0% comp growth, 16% EBITDA margins in 2018 = $869m EBITDA and $453m of FCF. Assumes $600m share repo at $24 avg price and 168m shares out by yr-end 2018.
I do not hold a position with the issuer such as employment, directorship, or consultancy. I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.
Catalyst
June 15th Investor Day, Q117 comps beat / re-acceleration in Q2
Are you sure you want to close this position MICHAELS COS INC (MIK)?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Flag MICHAELS COS INC (MIK) for Removal
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea MICHAELS COS INC (MIK) for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You Cannot Submit Message ... Yet
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are
1 way you can get the privilage.
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.