2015 | 2016 | ||||||
Price: | 6.47 | EPS | 0 | 0 | |||
Shares Out. (in M): | 11 | P/E | 0 | 0 | |||
Market Cap (in $M): | 69 | P/FCF | 0 | 0 | |||
Net Debt (in $M): | -19 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 50 | TEV/EBIT | 0 | 0 |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Identiv (ticker: INVE) is a $50M EV company trading for approximately ½ EV/Sales due to a recent revenue miss that has seen the stock collapse from its $15.00/share secondary offering in September to Monday’s 52-week low of $5.82. This throwing in of the towel by a few shareholders is understandable, given that some of them might have jumped on the bandwagon of a recent activist, who in turn expressed disappointment following the latest quarterly earnings that the company hadn’t already sold itself and might have “hit a wall” at $100M in revenues.
Perhaps those comments and the mediocre Q1 revenues shook investors who had hoped for the $400M company valuation that the CEO mentioned a year ago as his internally communication valuation for the company. It definitely also doesn’t help that the company is now a non-timely filer on its latest 10-Q, although Identiv did announce that they will file before the NASDAQ Plan of Compliance deadline.
However, mentioned in that disappointing earnings call was also the news that Identiv had picked up a key strategic relationship with Cisco to add to its win with Verizon and its already significant presence with Disney via Disney’s Infinity toy collection—in which Identiv has already shipped well over 150 million inlays for those toys.
THE INTERNET OF HACKED THINGS:
I was reading Marc Goodman’s excellent book Future Crimes: Everything is Connected, Everyone is Vulnerable and What We Can Do About It, in which he refers to the Internet of Things (IoT) as the Internet of Hacked Things. Identiv’s key customer wins in the credentialing division of their company makes them a promising player in security and authentication for IoT devices.
Despite the dramatic headlines in the main stream press, a bit of research reveals that the media has actually understated the vulnerability of our systems and devices. Smart devices in the IoT can be hacked, but just as disquieting, having so many monitors plugged into the network means opening up one’s network to that many more vendors who monitor these IoT devices—thermostats, cameras, etc. that need to be monitored and maintained. For example, the Target credit card breach in their point-of-sale systems came via the server access granted to a refrigeration and HVAC vendor at Target. Brian Krebs, the former Washington Post reporter who now writes Krebs on Security, has a good summary: http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/02/target-hackers-broke-in-via-hvac-company/. In another article, Krebs discusses the Internet of Dangerous Things while giving credit to an MIT researcher’s Internet of Treacherous Things research paper. As investors, while we read widely and none of this sneaks past us, further research shows that the coverage in the NYT and WSJ, to mention some of the better publications, barely brushes the surface of the current vulnerabilities.
Back to Identiv, and let’s start at what can only be a prematurely enthusiastic if not completely regrettable quote from the CEO at the end of his prepared remarks during their 2014q2 conference call:
So as you can see while we have made great progress over the last couple of quarters by simplifying focus the management's attention is now extremely focused on growth. I've often remarked internally that Identive is a $400 million company, when you look at comparables. It's just the quite frankly we are in the penalty box because of the company's prior performance. And my job as coach is to get us out of the penalty box and coach the team towards a victory.
And I think we have got the right team, we're at an interesting intersection in the market where the timing of the post password era is upon us with the technology and the patents that we have that will -- that have allowed us to position the business to be a dominant player in this space.
Perhaps the better quote to have paid attention to was less than a minute later when the CFO responded to a question about revenue momentum:
... as you know we are trying to be extremely cautious in the numbers and expectation that we give to the street. And the reason is frankly the company has had such a poor history of predictability. We’ve had couple of quarters where things have been pretty good. We are seeing the early investment in sales and marketing have some effect. The credential business is absolutely an excellent business for us. And we do see seasonality in that business. But we also see seasonality in the other parts of the business particularly the high margin premises business.
A closer look at quarterly revenues reveals that last year’s Q2 was a great YoY and sequential comp, hence that initial enthusiasm. Here are quarterly revenues including discontinued operations (seems to be how Bloomberg reports them) and in the final line excluding discontinued operations:
Revenue (M) |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Q1 |
21.2 |
16.0 |
17.2 |
14.9 |
Q2 |
23.9 |
18.2 |
22.3 |
est 22.0 |
Q3 |
22.9 |
20.9 |
22.7 |
est 26.4 |
Q4 |
21.0 |
19.5 |
19.4 |
|
Annual |
89.0 |
74.6 |
81.6 |
guidance 92.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual (10-K) |
71.2 |
74.3 |
81.2 |
|
In order for 2015 to meet the company’s guidance of $90M to $95M, Identiv will have to average approximately $26M per quarter for the rest of the year. While guidance needs to be taken with a grain of salt at this point, they did mention that the Q1 revenues fell short in part to the timing of the Cisco partnership, which will include an upfront payment. They seemed fairly confident on their timing.
In the 10-K, they mention that one customer was 23% of revenues. Given that their CFO mentioned that they have shipped over 150 million inlays for the Disney Infinity toys, and the toy line will be expanded to include the new Star Wars line, it’s a safe guess that Disney is their key customer. In addition to the toys, it appears that Identiv provides the authentication security in the Disney MagicBand—Disney’s billion dollar bet on a better theme park experience: http://www.wired.com/2015/03/disney-magicband/
DISNEY INFINITY TOY LINE:
A little background on the Disney Infinity toy line—but for Star Wars buffs, you can jump right to the release info for Disney Infinity 3.0 Edition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWnA-yXUmJI and some additional history on the development of the concept for the toy line: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPcpRLV1PFk.
That’s right, the Disney Infinity toy line let’s you take the toy, which has an inlay chip in its base that communicates with the game console—and is compatible with Xbox, Playstation, PC, and Wii, etc., and then have that character enter into its virtual world. When my children were younger, in order to liven up a long car ride or a quiet dinner table, we would create hypothetical combat tournaments—starting with a Sweet Sixteen of various matchups, we’d poll each other on who would win in a Bugs Bunny versus Wolverine battle, etc. Now, via Disney’s new toy line, the traditional Disney & Pixar characters, the Marvel characters and soon the Star Wars characters can be combined in myriad ways. Given some reviews, this is still evolving, but the trajectory seems clear toward an open gaming world of superheroes and cartoon favorites.
While discussion of this product is fun and has given me some nice images to paste into this otherwise scant write-up, the key for the investment case is that Identiv is at the heart of this product. In addition to providing the identification and credentialing so that a player can keep their preferences and history with them as they move from game to game, Identiv’s product provides essential anti-counterfeiting and authentication capabilities. It is these capabilities that will be important across the IoT universe.
The valuation case for Identiv can be summarized as follows:
· The Internet of Things has enormous security vulnerabilities
· Identiv has key customer wins from Disney, Cisco and Verizon
· Identiv is trading for approximately 0.5x EV/Sales (until this afternoon’s rally, it was at exactly that valuation), which takes care of enough downside that perhaps the upside will take care of itself.
REPORTING SEGMENTS:
Identiv has four reporting segments, and a look at their best quarter of 2014, which was Q3, shows the segment breakdown:
$12.8 million Credentials segment
$4.9 million Premises segment
$3.8 million Identity products
$1.2 million All other products
The premises segment is exactly what it sounds like—securing buildings via an integrated access control system. For example, INVE provides Cisco employees with ID’s that allow various permissions and access. Identity products would include smart card readers, tokens and terminals to enable PC, network or data access and security. All Other segment includes various products and readers that don’t make the quantitative thresholds for determining reportable segments.
But it is the Credentials segment that accounts for approximately half of the company’s revenues. These are the NFC (Near Field Communications) and RFID (radio frequency identification) products that are based on technology that Identiv is using to leverage their expertise into developing authentication and credentialing capabilities for devices on the Internet of Things.
ACTIVIST INVOLVEMENT:
David Callan is a small cap activist who had some success with some medical device stocks before getting involved with INVE. It does not appear that he owns enough to have a reporting stake, but his previous success and mentions of that history on Seeking Alpha and other venues undoubtedly caught the attention of microcap investors.
VALUATION:
Identiv closed at $6.47 today, up 11% from yesterday’s 52 week low. It doesn’t appear that there is any catalyst for this move other than a rebound back into the range of a few weeks ago. Identiv has 10.7 million shares outstanding for a $69.3M market cap, with $33.1M in cash and $14.0M in debt. The debt lines were recently extended to 2017, and the company expects to be adj. EBITDA positive for 2015 (versus negative $1.9M in Q1). Cash fell $3.4M QoQ, and the $31.5M in net proceeds from their 9/11/2014 secondary offering looks like enough as long as their revenues keep pace with their guidance.
DISCLAIMER:
The author of this posting and related persons or entities (“Author”) currently holds a long position in this security. Author may buy additional shares, or sell some or all of Author’s shares, at any time. Author has no obligation to inform anyone of any changes to Author’s view of INVE US. Please consult your financial, legal, and/or tax advisors before making any investment decisions. While the Author has tried to present facts it believes are accurate, the Author makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this note. The reader agrees not to invest based on this note, and to perform his or her own due diligence and research before taking a position in INVE US. READER AGREES TO HOLD AUTHOR HARMLESS AND HEREBY WAIVES ANY CAUSES OF ACTION AGAINST AUTHOR RELATED TO THE NOTE ABOVE. As with all investments, caveat emptor.
(P.S. Thank you to fellow VICster fiverocks for Disclaimer wording.)
Greater awareness of partnership with key IoT companies.
Recovery from poor quarter.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position IDENTIV INC?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea IDENTIV INC for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".