2007 | 2008 | ||||||
Price: | 3.25 | EPS | |||||
Shares Out. (in M): | 0 | P/E | |||||
Market Cap (in $M): | 119 | P/FCF | |||||
Net Debt (in $M): | 0 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 0 | TEV/EBIT |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
DMX presents an interesting opportunity to buy a growth story, which has a major catalyst coming up and yet provides a margin of safety.
What is DMX/I-Trax/
Here is the scoop on the growth. There are 7,500 company health sites in the
The Catalyst: DMX has promoted the benefits that they provide to employers, including how their combined focus lowers a company’s employee medical costs. However, due to their small size, there are a lot of skeptics about their value-add. They have a number of clients who have taken a wait-and-see approach and have only outsourced one or two sites. Recently, an independent, peer review study was conducted on their operations. The results of the study will be published by a medical journal in the coming weeks. Management has seen previews of the article, but cannot discuss it until publication. All that they have indicated is that the results show a magnitude of difference that exceeded their expectations. The significance to DMX will be profound. They will have positive proof of the benefits and savings that they offer to potential employers from an objective third-party, and they will generate a lot of good publicity. This will provide a significant lift to their growth. They are contemplating seeking patent status on their process. The second catalyst is that they are also near to securing a mega lift-out from a Fortune 50 company.
Margin of Safety: One of the programs that DMX offers is running closed-door pharmacies. Due to a class of trade designation, DMX can buy directly from the pharmaceutical companies at rates cheaper than a PBM and pass the savings onto the client in a very transparent way. However, they are restricted from selling to the public. The pharmacy contracts are run on cost plus basis, so DMX takes no inventory risk. DMX is fairly coy on the profitability of this program. The cost plus accounting requires them to report revenues net of expenses, and they are not required to report it separately. Thus, it is buried in the revenue figures but they do provide a gross revenue figure as a note to the financials. They did $38 million in the last quarter and $113 million YTD. Management has indicated that this is a low-margin business. If you assume 5% net margins and $150 million of gross revenues, that is $7.5 million of net per year that requires almost no capital commitment. At 10X earnings, the pharmacy business is worth about 60% of the market cap.
Competition: Only two other companies compete in the space, privately held Concentra and Matria (
Capital Requirements: One of the beauties of the health center business model is that they assume the business from the client, including hiring the existing staff. This requires minimal investment on the part of DMX. That is why management feels it will be able to internally fund growth. The average cash balance on their credit facility has decreased from about $9 million in January to about $6 million in September.
Valuation: So far, DMX has been a good story stock, but what is it worth? The answer depends upon how they grow. Management has guided revenues to be $138 million to $143 million in 2007 and that gross margins should eventually be in the 24% to 25% range. Below are projections out to 2010 that assume 20% revenue growth from 2008 to 2010 and 10%
|
Actual |
Actual |
Projected |
Projected |
Projected |
Projected |
Projected |
Year |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total Revenue |
76,402 |
115,887 |
123,000 |
138,000 |
165,600 |
198,720 |
238,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Services |
58,150 |
88,456 |
93,480 |
104,880 |
125,359 |
149,835 |
178,848 |
Sell./Gen./Admin. |
16,585 |
23,130 |
24,500 |
26,500 |
29,150 |
32,065 |
35,272 |
Depreciation |
3,866 |
3,616 |
3,325 |
3,304 |
3,304 |
3,304 |
3,304 |
Restructuring Exp. |
0 |
1,446 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total Operating Exp. |
78,601 |
116,648 |
121,305 |
134,684 |
157,813 |
185,204 |
217,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
-2,199 |
-761 |
1,695 |
3,316 |
7,787 |
13,516 |
21,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt. Conversion |
-133 |
-239 |
-240 |
-240 |
-240 |
-240 |
-240 |
Interest Expense |
-1,002 |
-454 |
-113 |
-113 |
-113 |
-113 |
-113 |
Other Expense |
-350 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Net Inc. Before Taxes |
-3,684 |
-1,454 |
1,342 |
2,963 |
7,434 |
13,163 |
20,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Rate |
-6.9% |
-10.1% |
17.4% |
33.7% |
36.0% |
36.0% |
36.0% |
Prov. for Income Taxes |
253 |
147 |
234 |
1,000 |
2,676 |
4,739 |
7,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
-3,937 |
-1,601 |
1,108 |
1,963 |
4,758 |
8,424 |
13,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pref. Dividends |
-1,878 |
-2,050 |
-282 |
-282 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Deemed Dividend |
-15,820 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Inc. to Common |
-21,635 |
-3,651 |
826 |
1,681 |
4,758 |
8,424 |
13,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7% |
20.0% |
19.9% |
19.2% |
17.6% |
16.1% |
14.8% |
Gross Margin |
23.9% |
23.7% |
24.0% |
24.0% |
24.3% |
24.6% |
25.0% |
Non-cash stock option |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
1,100 |
1,210 |
1,331 |
1,464 |
EBITDA |
1,667 |
2,855 |
6,020 |
7,720 |
12,301 |
18,151 |
25,809 |
Using a forward EBITDA multiple of 12X, the projected 2010 EV is $309.7 million. Assuming $6.5 million in net debt, I get a projected market cap of $303.2 million. I assume shares will grow to 45.9 million outstanding by the end of 2009 due to the preferreds converting and stock options. That implies a 2009 stock price of $6.60, representing a 19% CAGR over four years. If revenues grow 25%, it is a 28% CAGR. 30% growth is a 35% CAGR.
Here's the hair on DMX:
1. Dilution - They have 36.4 mm shares o/s and 5.7 mm shares issuable under a convertible preferred issue (in the cc they referenced that some preferreds had been exercised and converted) and 6.8 mm shares issuable under stock options and warrants that are largely in the money.
2. EBITDA - Their credit facility with BofA that they rely upon to fund working capital requires an escalating level of EBITDA that peaks at $4.45 mm (on a ttm basis) as of
3. Pharmacy
4. Competition - They are facing increased competition from PBM's and managed care operations. However, neither can provide the whole suite of services that DMX offers, and DMX seems to be the only one willing to run on-site clinics/primary care facilities for the employer. Most health insurers offer life style solutions (smoking cessation, diets, etc). Couple that with the influence that PBM's have, and it may be difficult for DMX to break into an employer's current healthcare arrangement.
5. Insurance - Since they employ healthcare professionals, they need professional liability insurance. The policies are "claims" made and they have a gap in prior years because two of the insurers that they bought policies from went bankrupt. In 2004, they created a captive insurance company to provide primary professional liability coverage, and then they are able to reinsure a portion of it.
6. One Large Customer - 11% of revenues come from one client. They also have a concentration of clients in the auto and manufacturing sectors. A slow down in auto sales could impact their revenues.
7. They have a poison pill.
References:
3rd Quarter conference call replay @
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position I-trax, Inc.?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea I-trax, Inc. for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".