HI-CRUSH PARTNERS LP HCLP
October 27, 2015 - 2:23pm EST by
hkup881
2015 2016
Price: 5.50 EPS 0 0
Shares Out. (in M): 37 P/E 0 0
Market Cap (in $M): 204 P/FCF 0 0
Net Debt (in $M): 247 EBIT 0 0
TEV (in $M): 450 TEV/EBIT 0 0

Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.

Description

There’s a colloquialism, “taking sand to the beach,” because sand is just so damn plentiful—except it’s
mostly in the wrong places. I’m talking about “frac sand” used as a proppant to increase recovery rates
in oil and gas wells. The sand that is desired is Northern White sand, predominantly found in
Wisconsinthe shale wells are spread in various basins many hundreds or even over a thousand miles
away.
 
The current prevailing view of frac sand producers is that they’re producing a commodity product. They
experienced a few good years as demand for sand ramped up faster than supply, then drilling activity
collapsedright as a bunch of supply is coming online and destroying margins. This would explain why a
company like HCLP is down 90% in a year. Here is a contrarian view of the sector.
 
Frac sand producers are really in the supply chain management and distribution business. The ability to
reliably service well operators with the right amount (full unit trains), grade of sand, delivered as close
as possible to their wells and do it effectively and cheaply will create a moat around certain of the larger
players. HCLP is the 4th largest frac sand producer in North America and will be the 2nd largest frac sand
producer in North America following the completion of the Blair facility owned by HCLP’s sponsor. This
dominance shows up in the recently announced third quarter where sales volume increased by 18%
sequentially while costs dropped by 16% sequentially at company owned facilities (1.4m tons in Q3 vs 1.2m in Q2)showing increased
market share and the scale produced by increased size, even in an industry where demand is currently
contracting and many competitors are going out of business.
 
On the demand side, over the past few years, there has been a sizable increase frac sand intensity, or
the number of tons used per well completion, due to increases in horizontal well length, number of frac
stages, and the volume of frac sand used per stage. Overall, frac sand usage per well has been increasing
rapidly with 10% to 40% increases per well in just the last year and 2 to 3-fold increases since 2012
depending on the basin in questionthis is the result of repeated experience that more sand used,
leads to better long term recovery and well economics. In terms of well economics, frac sand is the thing
that producers aren’t skimping on and as prices per ton drop—they’re using more.
 
However, this trend of increased frac sand intensity has been more than offset by a sizable drop in
overall wells drilled. Over the past year, overall frac sand usage has dropped from around 5 million tons
per month to about 2 million tons today (indicating that HCLP has roughly 25% market share based on
third quarter numbers). As a result, frac sand prices have also collapsed (HCLP realized price per ton
dropped from $88 in Q4/2014 to $57 in Q3/2015), creating the current opportunity.
 
My contrarian view is that current sand usage will stabilize a bit below current levels as a function of drilling
levels stabilizing at a slightly lower level than todayoffset by higher frac sand intensity and an
increasing trend of secondary hydraulic fracing of older wells to increase permeability. Many new frac
sand projects will be cancelled, high cost projects shuttered and existing players with high quality
distribution infrastructure in place will have a strong competitive advantage that will allow them to
continue to reduce costs over time as they add to their existing infrastructurefurther strengthening
this dominance.
 
Given the volatility in the industry, it’s probably foolish to try and give very precise estimates of near-
term trends, but if you take the third quarter of 2015, which is 4 quarters into the great oil decline, I
don’t think you’re too far off where numbers will bottom out—though I expect overall volumes to be
soft in the next quarter or two, while pricing per ton probably bottoms out near here as much of the industry
now operates at a loss. Based on the HCLP cc today, over the past quarter, 12 companies with 15 plants have shut production.
 
With HCLP distributable cash flow at $10.3 million or $.28 a share in Q3 2015, with a $5.50 share price,
you are buying in at less than 5x current cash flow. Even if cash flow continues to erode, you are likely
still buying in at a single digit multiple to cash flow, while still having a number of drivers for future cash
flow including;
 
-The completion of the Blair facility at the sponsor levelwhich HCLP will earn margins to distribute
-New terminal facilities
-Cost reductions
-Ability to park unused rolling stock at the Blair facility for free
 
Additionally, the new Blair facilities will lower transport costs by allowing HCLP to coordinate logistics
better over larger volumes. In the end, this will allow HCLP to become a more dominant logistics and
distribution company, supplying a product that is quite plentiful. I should note that management and
the sponsor owns about 37% of the company.
 
Finally, the company is focused on reducing costs while demand is weak. They recently shuttered the
high cost Augusta facility which will reduce capacity in the industry while reducing costs at HCLP. Yet,
while reducing production, they’re still investing $15-$25 million in 2016 to increase their footprint with
new terminals in various basins.
 
With the dividend now eliminated and the company focused on preserving liquidity, I expect a lot of yield
investors to puke up the stockhence the current buying opportunity. HCLP has one of the lowest cost
structures, best balance sheets and industry leading market shares that should allow it to weather this
storm and come out the other end as a stronger player.
 
Apologies on the brevity. The stock dropped with the dividend cut and I wanted to get this out there. Happy to answer questions in the Q&A

 

I do not hold a position with the issuer such as employment, directorship, or consultancy.
I and/or others I advise hold a material investment in the issuer's securities.

Catalyst

Future increases in drilling activity

Yield investors stop selling

Recovery in energy prices

    show   sort by    
      Back to top