2007 | 2008 | ||||||
Price: | 4.25 | EPS | |||||
Shares Out. (in M): | 0 | P/E | |||||
Market Cap (in $M): | 118 | P/FCF | |||||
Net Debt (in $M): | 0 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 0 | TEV/EBIT |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Idea
Gravity (GRVY) was the subject of a insightful VIC write-up in December 2006. At the time, the stock represented a great value with a terrific risk reward. Since that time, the stock has declined almost 30% from $5.85 to approximately $4.25. We believe this decline was driven by the general carnage in small cap land during the recent (hopefully finished) correction and a large shareholder selling (GRVY trades approximately 15,000 shares a day, so a big seller is very damaging). But the catalyst for the stock, the release of the Ragnarok 2 (R2) multi-player online game, is now only months away. Our due diligence on the game post the December write-up (see below) indicates that R2 is a solid game with an eager fan base. And the valuation has only become more compelling. The stock was cheap at $5.85; it is incredibly cheap at $4.25. With almost $3 per share in net cash, GRVY would trade at only 1x earnings if R2 matches the earrings of the original game. If the game is merely half as successful as its predecessor, it would trade for a 2 P/E ex-cash. I don’t see many of those available in the market. We believe there is approximately $1 in downside (trades to net cash) and upside of 3x or more.
Background / Activism
GRVY, based in
The stock declined soon thereafter and has become an activist battleground. In August 2005, EZER, an affiliate of Softbank, purchased Gravity’s former Chairman Kim Jung Ryul’s 52.4% stake in the company for an estimated $24.70 per share or 3.5x its then trading price of $7.10. EZER declared in an SEC filing that it had acquired the stake in GRVY to secure a continued licensing deal for the Ragnarok game. EZER further stated that it would not pay over $7.10 per share for the remaining shares in GRVY, threatened to have the Company delisted from the NASDAQ, and raised the possibility of using its voting power to force the sale of all the Company’s assets. These strong-arm tactics resulted in a shareholder backlash. Ramius Capital and Moon Capital, hedge funds with a combined $8 billion in assets under management and a 16% stake in GRVY, have taken the lead in protecting minority shareholders.
We believe corporate governance has improved significantly over the last few months. The Company has become much more responsive to investors. Management has begun hosting earnings calls, shareholder meetings and doing road shows in the
The Company is set to release R2 over the next few months in
Due Diligence
We have retained consultants who work at a game development firm and are affiliated with departments at academic institutes that study gaming. They have played the beta (which was in Korean) and surveyed online chat sites. They have reported that the game appears to be a solid sequel, with improved graphics, interesting characters and good music. While the beta had some technical glitches (not unusual), the chat sites indicate it has been very well received.
We have also found numerous references to the game on the internet. YouTube has 2,800 trailers and clips from the beta. Considering that YouTube is more US/Western oriented and Ragnarok is primarily an Asian phenomenon, this seems to indicate good buzz.
While no due diligence can guarantee the game is a smash hit (or even a success), our findings point to a well received product with an excited fan base.
Financial Analysis
GRVY has a market capitalization of approximately $120m. The Company has over $80m in cash and short-term investments (approximately $3 per share) giving it a TEV of only $40m. The Company is currently losing money as it is between game cycles. So it has trough revenues coupled with elevated expenses for development. However, the losses are not especially big (net loss of $1m for Q1 2007, the last quarter reported) and cash has actually grown due to upfront licensing fees. At the Q1 burn rate, the Company has 20 years of cash in the bank giving us confidence it should not trade below net cash even if the game fails. At its peak, Ragnarok earned over $1.20 per share and generated approximately $40m in EBITDA (so a P/E less cash of approximately 1x and a TEV / EBITDA of approximately 1x). Even with conservative assumption on the games success (only earns $.25 for example), the stock is cheap.
Idea
Gravity (GRVY) was the subject of a insightful VIC write-up in December 2006. At the time, the stock represented a great value with a terrific risk reward. Since that time, the stock has declined almost 30% from $5.85 to approximately $4.25. We believe this decline was driven by the general carnage in small cap land during the recent (hopefully finished) correction and a large shareholder selling (GRVY trades approximately 15,000 shares a day, so a big seller is very damaging). But the catalyst for the stock, the release of the Ragnarok 2 (R2) multi-player online game, is now only months away. Our due diligence on the game post the December write-up (see below) indicates that R2 is a solid game with an eager fan base. And the valuation has only become more compelling. The stock was cheap at $5.85; it is incredibly cheap at $4.25. With almost $3 per share in net cash, GRVY would trade at only 1x earnings if R2 matches the earrings of the original game. If the game is merely half as successful as its predecessor, it would trade for a 2 P/E ex-cash. I don’t see many of those available in the market. We believe there is approximately $1 in downside (trades to net cash) and upside of 3x or more.
Background / Activism
GRVY, based in
The stock declined soon thereafter and has become an activist battleground. In August 2005, EZER, an affiliate of Softbank, purchased Gravity’s former Chairman Kim Jung Ryul’s 52.4% stake in the company for an estimated $24.70 per share or 3.5x its then trading price of $7.10. EZER declared in an SEC filing that it had acquired the stake in GRVY to secure a continued licensing deal for the Ragnarok game. EZER further stated that it would not pay over $7.10 per share for the remaining shares in GRVY, threatened to have the Company delisted from the NASDAQ, and raised the possibility of using its voting power to force the sale of all the Company’s assets. These strong-arm tactics resulted in a shareholder backlash. Ramius Capital and Moon Capital, hedge funds with a combined $8 billion in assets under management and a 16% stake in GRVY, have taken the lead in protecting minority shareholders.
We believe corporate governance has improved significantly over the last few months. The Company has become much more responsive to investors. Management has begun hosting earnings calls, shareholder meetings and doing road shows in the
The Company is set to release R2 over the next few months in
Due Diligence
We have retained consultants who work at a game development firm and are affiliated with departments at academic institutes that study gaming. They have played the beta (which was in Korean) and surveyed online chat sites. They have reported that the game appears to be a solid sequel, with improved graphics, interesting characters and good music. While the beta had some technical glitches (not unusual), the chat sites indicate it has been very well received.
We have also found numerous references to the game on the internet. YouTube has 2,800 trailers and clips from the beta. Considering that YouTube is more US/Western oriented and Ragnarok is primarily an Asian phenomenon, this seems to indicate good buzz.
While no due diligence can guarantee the game is a smash hit (or even a success), our findings point to a well received product with an excited fan base.
Financial Analysis
GRVY has a market capitalization of approximately $120m. The Company has over $80m in cash and short-term investments (approximately $3 per share) giving it a TEV of only $40m. The Company is currently losing money as it is between game cycles. So it has trough revenues coupled with elevated expenses for development. However, the losses are not especially big (net loss of $1m for Q1 2007, the last quarter reported) and cash has actually grown due to upfront licensing fees. At the Q1 burn rate, the Company has 20 years of cash in the bank giving us confidence it should not trade below net cash even if the game fails. At its peak, Ragnarok earned over $1.20 per share and generated approximately $40m in EBITDA (so a P/E less cash of approximately 1x and a TEV / EBITDA of approximately 1x). Even with conservative assumption on the games success (only earns $.25 for example), the stock is cheap.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position Gravity?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea Gravity for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".