How would you like to own a retailer that is dominant in its
niche, has stores concentrated in a geographic region with a healthy economy,
and has a very strong brand name and great real estate , both of which factors
would make it difficult for a competitor to threaten or supplant them? Let’s say this retailer is growing its store
base by close to 10% per year, is growing comp stores 3-5% per year, and has
just weathered a tough year in the industry without missing a beat. How would you value this company? If you could buy it for 6.1x ’06 EBITDA and
5.6x conservative ’07 EBITDA, or 7.5x ’06 EBITDA – Cap X (including all new
store Cap X) and 6.8x ’07, would that be attractive? What if the company is not going to pay taxes
until 2011 and will distribute most or all of its excess cash flow to
shareholders until that time, but that even if you fully taxed earnings, the
P/E ratio would be 10.7x ’06 and 9.8x ’07?
Even the most hardened value investor would likely find this attractive,
unless he or she hates retailers and hates golfing.
Where would we find such a company?
Canada
- where the government has just turned the stock market and investor community
upside down by proposing regulations that will eventually eliminate all
advantages that income trusts have enjoyed over the past 10 years. This week, the average income trust is down
15-20%, as investors have calculated the impact of the changes and hit the
market accordingly. However, this has
led certain companies to now trade at prices that would be attractive even if
they were not income trusts. I believe
that Golf Town Income Fund is one of those companies.
Golf Town
is the leading golf retailer in Canada,
with stores in all the major markets across the country. The company currently has approximately 28
stores, and has been opening 2-4 new stores annually, a rate it expects to
continue for several years. The stores
average 18,000 square feet, and carry a huge assortment of clubs, apparel and
accessories. Management is excellent –
CEO Stephen Bebis is viewed among the leading retailers in Canada,
having previously run a home center chain that Home Depot acquired to enter Canada.
The business is fairly straightforward, so I will direct you
to SEDAR (
www.sedar.com) to view the
company’s filings. I will quickly run
through the numbers (all in Canadian dollars).
The company has 12.5mm fully-diluted shares, and $15mm of debt, with
total enterprise value of $142mm. EBITDA
is projected to be $24mm in ’06 and $26mm in ’07. The company has a consistent record of
beating earnings estimates and raising its distributions. CapX is
estimated to be $4.5mm annually, which covers 3 new stores at $1.4mm each, plus
a small amount of IT and maintenance CapX.
The store base is young, so they do not have to spend much if anything
on refurbishing stores, and their infrastructure is in good shape to handle the
expected growth. The company is
currently paying out distributions at the rate of $1.15 per year, a
conservative 70% of its distributable cash (a Canadian term) and roughly 100%
of its free cash flow. The table below
lays out key financial information and some back of the envelope projections:
Stock
Price |
|
$
10.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding |
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
131.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt |
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value |
|
146.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA |
|
|
EBITDA |
2006 |
24.0 |
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
26.0 |
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA - Cap X |
2006 |
19.5 |
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
21.5 |
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (10%
growth after '07) |
24.0 |
26.0 |
28.6 |
31.5 |
34.6 |
38.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amort. |
|
4.5 |
4.5
|
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.8 |
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
1.6 |
1.6
|
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax |
|
17.9 |
19.9 |
22.4 |
25.2 |
28.2 |
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes (Theoretical until '11) |
5.6 |
6.3 |
7.1 |
7.9 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
(Assuming fully-taxed) |
12.3 |
13.6 |
15.4 |
17.2 |
19.3 |
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS - Actual |
|
$
1.43 |
$
1.59 |
$
1.79 |
$
2.01 |
$
2.26 |
$
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS - Fully-taxed |
|
$
0.98 |
$
1.09 |
$
1.23 |
$
1.38 |
$
1.55 |
$
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5% growth after '07) |
|
$ 1.15 |
$ 1.20 |
$
1.26 |
$
1.32 |
$
1.39 |
??? |
There are several ways to look at valuation. You can assume a terminal multiple on
estimated 2011 earnings, and then take the NPV of that number as well as the
estimated distributions between now and then.
Assuming 10% annual EBITDA growth, 5% annual growth in distributions, a
13x terminal PE multiple, you get to a value today or $15-19 per share using
discount rates of 10-15%. Alternatively,
you can look at this as if it had an NOL that would cover the next 4 years of
earnings. In that case, you could put a
multiple of 13-15x ’06 or ’07 fully-taxed earnings, and add the present value
of the next 4 years of tax savings, around $2 per share according to my
calculation. That would put you in the
same range. Either way, I believe it is
a steal in the $10.50 range.
A few other things to consider. Close followers of the Canadian stock market
have expressed the opinion that if this legislation passes, it will likely lead
to much increased LBO activity, especially among smaller income trusts that
would probably not have gone public except as an income trust. Golf
Town would be a strong candidate. There has also been periodic speculation that
Golf Galaxy (GGXY) would be very interested in acquiring Golf
Town. Golf Galaxy is a Minneapolis-based company
that was actually involved in the founding of Golf
Town,(Golf
Town was modeled after Golf Galaxy
and has similar stores and merchandising strategies) and has a non-compete
preventing it from entering Canada
until 2008. The upcoming expiration of
the non-compete could be viewed as a negative if Golf Galaxy decides to open
its own stores in Canada, but an acquisition might be a more likely route. Another potential acquirer might be Forzani
Group, which among other retail operations, owns the Nevada Bob chain in Canada
(20 stores). Forzani is trading at PE
and EBITDA multiples of 18.3x and 7.1x, respectively on ’06, and 12.9x and
6.4x, respectively on ’07.
The company is reporting earnings for the September quarter (their second biggest quarter) in the next 12 days. I have no particular insight, I do know that Golf Town raised its distribution in August, which probably is a good sign that business has continued to be strong.
Canadian market settling down after this week's turmoil, with companies being valued going forward on the basis on tax paying companies.
Continued strong operating results and rising distributions.