ESTERLINE TECHNOLOGIES (ESL)
Introduction
Esterline
Technologies engages in the design, manufacture and marketing of engineered
products and systems for application in the aerospace/defense industries. At $41, ESL is attractive because:
- Strong
secular tailwinds and good business positioning
- Attractive
valuation (15x FY 10/07 EPS) with good free cash flow yield (8-10%)
- Automatic
margin expansion opportunities as currently elevated R&D activities
(to “pre-fund” the 787 and A400M platforms) come back down to a normal
level
- Numerous
accretive acquisition opportunities
- Excellent
candidate for a takeout (by a strategic or financial buyer)
Business Summary
ESL
is a leading specialized manufacturer principally serving the commercial
aerospace (40%), defense (40%) and general industrial (20%) markets. ESL’s sales are diversified among numerous
customers, with no single platform contributing to more than 3-4% of
revenues. Most of ESL’s products are
smaller items, but in most cases ESL is the #1 or #2 market leader and designed
into existing platforms. About 35% of
the sales are for the OEM market, 45% to service the aftermarket, and the
remaining 20% are consumables.
ESL
operates in 3 segments:
Avionics and Controls – Technology interface systems for
military, commercial aircrafts and military vehicles; secure communications
systems; specialized medical equipment and other industrial applications. These products include lighted push-button
and rotary switches, keyboards, lighted indicators, control sticks, grips/wheels,
panels and displays. These products have
been integrated into every Boeing commercial aircraft platform currently in
production, most Airbus platforms and most types of military jets and
helicopters.
Sensors and Systems – High-precision temperature and
pressure sensors, electrical power switching, control and data communication
devices, fluid control components, micro-motors, motion control sensors and
other related systems. ESL is the
sole-source supplier of temperature probes on all CFM-56 engines (100% of
737NGs and 40% of Airbus).
Advanced Materials – High-performance elastomer
products used in a wide range of commercial aerospace and military
applications, and combustible ordnance for military applications. These products include proprietary
formulations for silicone rubber with superior performance in high temperature,
high pressure, caustic, abrasive and other difficult environments. ESL also manufactures molded fiber cartridge
cases, mortar increments, igniter tubes, combustible casings, radar ECM chaff
and decoy flares.
Investment Thesis
Secular Tailwind – Both the
aerospace and defense sectors are benefiting from secular tailwinds right
now. Commercial aerospace is in the
middle of a multi-year rebound, with a LTM 2.8x book-to-bill. While this ratio is slightly lower than where
it was a year ago, it’s still significantly higher than 1. Based on the current order books at Boeing
and Airbus, we do not expect the current cycle to peak until 2010 at the
earliest, and possibly well into 2013-2015 once the legacy US/European carriers
begin replacing their 737s/A320s with the next generation narrow-bodies. The defense business, while less robust than
commercial aerospace, should continue to benefit from faster-than-GDP growth at
least through 2011. Management has
guided to “high single digit” organic growth rate, while we’re conservatively
modeling 6.5% organic CAGR for the next two years.
Broad and Stable Product Base
– As CEO Bob Cremin likes to describe it, ESL doesn’t hit many home runs but
there are lots of singles and doubles.
In other words, most of ESL’s products are smaller items that are
ubiquitous in aerospace and defense applications. The following are characteristics are
examples why ESL’s product portfolio is fairly stable
- ESL has content on every Boeing platform and a
majority of Airbus platforms today.
Not single platform is a significant portion of revenue.
- Often times ESL is a sole supplier or dual
supplier.
- There is a high barrier to entry as most of ESL’s
products are designed into platforms and cannot be changed out
easily. ESL’s manufacturing
processes are also certified by the end customers.
- A large percentage of ESL’s products are
consumables or for the aftermarket.
While that means ESL will not have the same type of revenue growth
as an OEM, ESL should enjoy more stability.
Accretive Acquisitions – ESL
has been acquisitive in its past, and will likely continue to make accretive
acquisitions going forward (which we have not yet modeled in). Going forward, Boeing and Airbus will likely
outsource more and more of its components, so it’s critical for ESL to
establish itself as a relevant Tier 1 supplier in its specific niches. Historically, ESL has only acquired good
businesses with good management teams that stay in place post-acquisition. ESL had not extracted significant gross
margin synergies, given the difficulty of getting new product lines
re-certified, and the fact that most of ESL’s products are lower-volume but higher-spec
in nature. On an SG&A level,
however, ESL has made good use of cross-selling opportunities and overhead
leverage to reduce SG&A as % of sales from 22% to 16.5%. Going forward, ESL does not expect
significant additional SG&A expenses as the sales continue to ramp.
Margin Expansion – ESL’s
current EBIT margins are just under 10%, down from the last peak of 15.3%
(2001) but higher than the trough of 8.2% (2004). The current EBIT margins are depressed
because ESL won Tier 1 supplier status with the 787, A400M, and Europrop
(engines for A400M). These platforms are
expected to have production lives of several decades, but much of the upfront
R&D must be expensed immediately.
Thus, ESL’s R&D has risen to 5.5-6% of sales to accommodate these
and other programs. Historically, ESL’s
R&D has run in the 3.5-4.5% range, and management indicated that R&D is
expected to decline to the “low 4’s” by the end of FY 2007. This R&D contraction alone will boost
EBIT margins by 100-200bps, and management believes that EBIT margins will
again reach at least the 15% level during the peak of this cycle. We are conservatively modeling 12% EBIT
margins for FY 2008.
Attractive Take-Out Candidate
– ESL’s management team had worked with a private equity firm in the past
(Dyson-Kissner-Moran) and continues to run the firm like a private
company. While from a business
operations point of view, the management should be lauded for making investment
decision purely based on ultimate returns, the public market does not always
react well to the volatility of ESL’s quarterly earnings. The higher R&D spend is one example of
this – while most would probably agree that winning additional content on
future platforms is good for business, we believe the public market is unfairly
penalizing ESL for the upfront R&D spend. Ironically, if ESL continues to ramp its Tier
1 wins, R&D may continue to stay at an elevated level, sacrificing
near-term earnings for long-term gains.
ESL is currently under-leveraged, and our buyout model supports a $50
takeout and 20+% IRR. Management has
publicly complained about the disadvantages of being a public company and we
believe they are open to all strategic alternatives.
Attractive Valuation – At
$41, ESL is trading at 15.5x FY 10/07 EPS ($2.65) and 12.6x FY 10/08 EPS
($3.25). We believe our estimates are very
conservative, given that we are assuming very little margin expansion,
especially considering that R&D will likely decrease materially once the
current Tier 1 platforms are fully designed.
In addition, we are leaving the capital structure under-leveraged, and
not assuming any accretive acquisitions (even though the likelihood of both
events happening together is very small).
Using more baseline assumptions and 15-17x forward EPS ($3.50), we
believe the stock is worth mid to high $50’s within the next 12 months. In addition, ESL generates great free cash
flow (despite its under-leverage), which we estimate to imply an 8-10% yield
based on our conservative assumptions.
Risk Factors
Roll-up Risk – Since ESL has
been built from numerous smaller acquisitions, investor always fear a “blow-up
risk.” We believe the situation here is
mitigated by the fact that ESL only buys healthy businesses with good
management teams that stay on with the business. ESL does not typically try to integrate
production processes due to the lack of economies of scale for smaller-run,
highly customized products, and the long process required for re-certifying
changes to a production line.
Industry Slow Down Risk – 80%
of ESL’s products are sold to commercial aerospace and defense customers. While we believe the commercial aerospace
cycle is in the midst of a multi-year rebound, the industry is susceptible to
terrorism risk and order cancellations.
The defense industry is susceptible to spending cuts and the level of
military activities around the globe.
According to management, the spending on consumables doesn’t slow down
dramatically once a conflict concludes.
The consumption simply moves from combat to restocking to training. Typical variance of peak-to-trough level of
activity is under 10%.
Working Capital Drain – In
2006, ESL used up the bulk of its operating cash flow in working capital
increases. Receivable days have
increased as ESL now has a greater number of international customers, and
inventories have increased as the entire aerospace supply chain tried to lock
up supplies. Given what’s happened to
Airbus in the past 2 years, we’re encouraged to see ESL position itself as a
dependable supplier to the OEMs. We
don’t expect this to continue beyond 2006.
Quarterly Volatility – Given
ESL’s management style, we expect continued volatility in ESL’s quarterly
results.
Catalysts
1.
Wind-down of the
excess R&D spend on future Tier 1 platforms.
2.
Continued
earnings growth driven by the industry tailwind.
3.
Fixing the
under-leverage by either deploying debt capital, or by making cash
acquisitions.
Fixing the under-leverage by either deploying debt capital, or by making cash acquisitions.