2012 | 2013 | ||||||
Price: | 10.72 | EPS | NM | $0.00 | |||
Shares Out. (in M): | 92 | P/E | NM | 0.0x | |||
Market Cap (in $M): | 9,861 | P/FCF | NM | 0.0x | |||
Net Debt (in $M): | 336 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 1,286 | TEV/EBIT | NM | 0.0x | |||
Borrow Cost: | NA |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Education Realty (ticker: EDR) is a REIT that owns, develops, and manages student housing communities located on or off university campuses. As of 3Q11, it owns 21,482 beds and a development pipeline with an additional 2,208 beds that will come online in the summer of 2012 and 2013.
Investment Thesis: Short EDR because
The Business Model
Moat
EDR has two economic moats.
2 Existing relationships
Capex
EDR reports its “recurring capital expenditure” for the last 3 preceding years in each of its annual report. The number is broken down into “per bed” basis and exclude discontinued operations to give investors better comps.
EDR |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
Average |
recurring capex - continue op |
(1.64) |
(2.22) |
(2.49) |
(2.85) |
(4.06) |
(4.41) |
|
# of beds - continue op |
18,548 |
20,125 |
20,125 |
19,878 |
20,400 |
21,071 |
|
capex/bed/yr |
(88.31) |
(110.41) |
(123.58) |
(143.12) |
(198.77) |
(209.10) |
-145.55 |
Source: annual report
American Campus Communities (ticker: ACC), EDR’s listed competitor, also reports a recurring capex number.
ACC |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
Average |
recurring capex |
(1.83) |
(2.76) |
(3.39) |
(8.03) |
(9.19) |
(10.14) |
|
Average # of beds |
9,941 |
15,995 |
19,125 |
45,069 |
47,223 |
50,506 |
|
capex/bed/yr |
(183.88) |
(172.43) |
(177.25) |
(178.22) |
(194.61) |
(200.69) |
-184.51 |
Source: annual report
The difference between the two companies’ capex number is small enough to be reasonably explained away by timing of capex, age of the property and selection of starting date etc. So far so good, at least that’s what I thought until I dig deeper into ACC’s annual report. EDR does not really define “recurring capex” other than saying it excludes “renovations, community repositioning and other major capital periodic projects”.
Below is ACC’s definition of non-recurring capex. Look closely on how they define the non-recurring part.
“Non-recurring capital expenditures include expenditures that were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a property which were considered necessary to bring the property up to "operating standard," and incremental improvements that include, among other items: community centers, new windows, and kitchen/bath apartment upgrades.”
Source: annual report
Now, common sense tells me that windows, kitchen and bath do wear down. While they do not require upgrades every year, they should count as part of “maintenance capex” because just like the hotels, the new windows, kitchen and bath are part of the appeal to students.
So I decided to calculate capex on a cash basis.
EDR |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
Average |
full capex |
(5.51) |
(4.86) |
(8.46) |
(13.99) |
(11.30) |
(17.98) |
|
# of beds |
17,665 |
22,760 |
25,241 |
24,687 |
25,183 |
24,579 |
|
(312.09) |
(213.44) |
(335.29) |
(566.53) |
(448.64) |
(731.44) |
-434.57 |
ACC |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
Average |
full capex |
(3.64) |
(6.89) |
(8.10) |
(15.35) |
(40.99) |
(30.40) |
|
Average # of beds |
10,511 |
15,866 |
19,572 |
34,149 |
47,949 |
52,350 |
|
capex/bed/yr |
(346.21) |
(434.07) |
(413.70) |
(449.38) |
(854.92) |
(580.69) |
-513.16 |
Please note the avg # of beds is different because the company reports on a continuing basis which excludes discontinued operations. I just use the opening # of beds + the ending # divided by 2
Now it’s clear that the “renovations, community repositioning and other major capital periodic projects” that EDR exclude from “recurring” capex is much higher than the recurring number itself. The ACC full capex number confirms that I am not way off-base with EDR.
True maintenance capex should be somewhat lower – but not by much - than full capex because both companies are acquiring beds and capex are needed to bring those beds “up to standard”. ACC number is much higher because it is growing its # of beds at 30% CAGR. I believe each property has to be renovated every 6 – 8 years. EDR’s full capex should be quite close to true maintenance capex as its # of beds has been relatively stable since FY2006.
Valuation
Using management’s recurring capex number, EDR’s FCF/share should earn $0.37/share in FY2012. Calculations are shown in Appendix A. The P/FCF multiple is 28.6x or FCF yield of 3.45% with the stock trading at $10.72. By any measure this is an expensive stock. I would have expected this company to be a monopoly with huge revenue or earnings growth.
EDR |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
3Q11 |
CAGR |
# of beds |
19,501 |
26,019 |
24,463 |
24,911 |
25,454 |
23,704 |
21,482 |
1.63% |
Rev/available bed |
374 |
385 |
345 |
395 |
375 |
394 |
1.01% |
Define as total rental revenue (including discontinued operations) divided by average # of beds. This excludes expense reimbursements and 3rd party development/management service.
Some might argue total revenue is not comparable to EDR’s forward operations as EDR has bought and sold properties. May be the “continuing operations” would show a different trend?
EDR |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
CAGR |
Rev/available bed |
369 |
386 |
401 |
396 |
390 |
383 |
0.75% |
Source: annual report
Historic revenue growth rate certainly cannot explain why EDR is trading at such high multiples. In 2009, EDR introduced its “the ONE Plan” which is code for upgrading its portfolio from off-campus housing (no moat) to on-campus housing (moat). Future growth rate should be higher but by how much?
Fortunately ACC reports its on-campus housing number separately.
ACC |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
CAGR |
Rev/available bed, wholly -owned |
478.81 |
500.94 |
513.43 |
487.49 |
480.48 |
484.49 |
0.24% |
Rev/available bed, on-campus |
340.45 |
367.99 |
386.63 |
406.47 |
419.10 |
442.11 |
5.37% |
Total |
437.20 |
471.46 |
489.65 |
453.74 |
475.20 |
481.12 |
1.93% |
Define as total rental revenue (including discontinued operations) divided by average # of beds. This excludes expense reimbursements and 3rd party development/management service.
So on-campus housing has the ability to grow its revenue 5 – 5.5% annually. If all of EDR’s properties are on-campus, I can see why people would pay 20x multiple for its earnings. With EDR’s current asset mix and growth potential, I believe anything above 14x multiple would be overvalued. A 14x multiple without adjusting for true capex equals a price of $5.18/share. (0.37 * 14)
Further Dilution
First, let’s take a look at some EDR’s numbers.
EDR |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
3Q11 |
CAGR |
diluted # of shares |
24.94 |
27.97 |
29.47 |
29.87 |
41.87 |
58.74 |
91.82 |
24.26% |
The number of shares outstanding almost quadrupled in less than 6 years. This is not necessary harmful to shareholders if the company is using the proceeds to make new investments or paying down its debt.
EDR |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
CAGR |
RE asset at cost |
645.17 |
897.61 |
858.97 |
896.19 |
927.18 |
1,377.75 |
16.39% |
Operating FCF |
31.92 |
54.06 |
53.78 |
56.50 |
49.78 |
53.80 |
11.00% |
FCF |
11.65 |
20.63 |
22.87 |
19.44 |
18.92 |
19.48 |
10.83% |
FCF/share |
0.47 |
0.74 |
0.78 |
0.65 |
0.45 |
0.33 |
-6.62% |
Depreciation is added back and operating lease is capitalized when calculating asset at cost
Clearly, the numbers suggest that the expanded asset base and operating FCF did not benefit shareholders due to equity dilution.
Below was taken from EDR’s 3Q11 earnings call transcript
“Obtaining an unsecured credit facility completes step one in our goal of achieving an investment grade rating of our corporate debt, which we anticipate to achieve within 18 months.”
<Q - Alexander D. Goldfarb>: Okay. And then as far the 18 months, is that just based on your view of how long it will take you to get your unencumbered asset base to where it needs to be or where does the 18 months come from?
<A - Randall L. Churchey>: Yeah. There's three areas that we feel we need to focus on; one of which you just mentioned, the unencumbered asset base to gross asset. Randy mentioned we need to reduce the – our reliance of secured debt, and we're definitely working on that. And then the third is the company size. So I think we have a plan laid out that will enable us to achieve all of those and improve all those metrics over that 18 month period.
<Q - Alexander D. Goldfarb>: And then where are you now with the unencumbered assets and secured assets and where do you need to be?
<A - Randall L. Churchey>: We're at about 33%. We need to be 50% or better.
Source: 3Q11 earnings call
Management has stated that they are actively seeking acquisitions and developments. Therefore, shrinking the balance sheet is not an option. The call took place October, 2011. So the 18 month timeline management refers to will be April 2013.
As of 3Q11, secured debt outstanding is $335.9m. To increase unencumbered asset from 33% to 50% of gross assets, EDR needs to pay off $85.4m of debt. Assuming a secondary can be done at today’s price of $10.72, the number of shares would increase by 8mm or 8.7% in the next 14 months.
Moreover, EDR is highly levered. (Net interest bearing debt + operating lease) / adjusted EBITDA = (335.9 + 487.9 – 47.34 – 4.6) / (60.3 + 11.5) = 10.75x. Perversely, an equity dilution to pay down the debt is actually beneficial to shareholder in the context of reducing risks.
Appendix A
Earnings Power
Major expenditures were student housing operating expense, maintenance capex, corporate G&A and interest expense.
EDR |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FY 2007 |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FY 2010 |
Revenue/available bed/month |
374 |
385 |
345 |
395 |
375 |
394 |
Define as total rental revenue (including discontinued operations) divided by average # of beds. This excludes expense reimbursements and 3rd party development/management service.
As of 3Q11, EDR has 21,482 available beds and 2,208 in development. The 3rd party business brings about $8mm/yr. CAGR from 2005 – 10 has been at 1%. Let’s be aggressive and assume 5% growth, revenue would be $394*1.05 * 12 * (21,482 + 2,208)+ 8 = $125.6mm
Operating margins before capex has averaged 45%. Let’s assume 48% margin. So before capex and interest expense EDR is earning about $125.6 * 0.48 = $60.3mm.
To finish the development pipeline EDR needs at least $95.8m. (total cost – sunk cost – cash – restricted cash).
As of 3Q11, interest bearing debt is $335.9mm. Current weighted average interest rate is 5.55%. Assuming EDR can lower that to 5.3%, interest cost would be $(335.9 + 95.8) *0.053 = $22.9m.
If you take a leap of faith and use the “recurring capex” number, capex would be 23,690 beds * $145.55 = $3.45mm. FCF/share would be $(60.3 – 22.9 – 3.45) / 91.82 = $0.37/share in FY2012.
Using a realistic assumption of 2% revenue growth, 45% margin and using the full capex: 23,690 * 434.57 = $10.3mm. FCF/share will be $0.24/share. EDR is trading at 44.7x normal FCF. EDR is worth $3.36/share at 14x FCF.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position EDUCATION REALTY TRUST INC?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea EDUCATION REALTY TRUST INC for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".