2013 | 2014 | ||||||
Price: | 10.27 | EPS | $0.85 | $1.10 | |||
Shares Out. (in M): | 4 | P/E | 12.1x | 9.3x | |||
Market Cap (in $M): | 40 | P/FCF | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
Net Debt (in $M): | 0 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 0 | TEV/EBIT | 0.0x | 0.0x |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Description
Broncos727 submitted Eagle Bancorp nearly two years ago at roughly the same price and his thesis is one we agree with. While much of what he wrote is still applicable, the story has been enhanced by a recent acquisition of a competitor’s bank branches: adding heft to the balance sheet and ultimately making this a more likely acquisition target in its own right. Eagle, like many small thrifts and commercial banks, has been pressured by a declining net interest margin in the face of a flattening yield curve, tepid loan demand, and in this case, an overcapitalized balance sheet. As a reminder, EGMT is a mutual to stock conversion and as such found itself with a surplus of capital at a time where it was disadvantageous to do so from a GAAP earnings standpoint.
Recent Acquisition
In July of this past year, the company acquired 7 branches from Sterling Financial for slightly less than a 4% deposit premium. The acquisition expanded their footprint into Southern Montana-most notably Billings and Missoula, cities in which they previously didn’t have a presence and roughly doubled their state-wide market share. Here are some of the details of what they acquired and their rationale for the transaction:
Below is a decent link to some economic statistics about Montana.
http://ceic.mt.gov/MTEconomistsResourcePage.asp
Snapshot from latest Quarter
A proforma look at the combined company on an ‘as-if’ basis is below
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
||||||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net interest income |
|
$ |
3,684 |
|
|
$ |
3,700 |
|
|
$ |
7,209 |
|
|
$ |
7,394 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
2,328 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
4,894 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
8,691 |
|
|
|
8,228 |
|
Net income1) |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
1) |
|
Significant assumptions utilized include the acquisition cost noted above, amortization/accretion of interest rate fair value adjustments, amortization of the core deposit intangible asset and a 25% effective tax rate. |
There are some puts and takes but it seems that the company is doing somewhere between .80-$1.00 on an annualized basis. However, referring back to the statistics above, it appears the company is under-loaned against its deposit base at roughly 52%. We are operating under the assumption that the company is able to grow its loan book at 5% per annum for the next three years which should add roughly 35mm to their loan book. At current spreads, which we’d argue are depressed, they should be adding about .20 per share in net interest income.
Insider Ownership (as of most recent proxy)
Name |
|
Title or Address(2) |
|
Number |
|
Percent |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sandler O’Neill Asset Management, LLC |
|
150 E. 52nd Street, 30th Floor New York, NY 10022 |
|
|
300,000 |
(7) |
|
|
7.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Hedge Management, LLC |
|
75 State Street Boston, MA 02109 |
|
|
292,700 |
(8) |
|
|
7.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Federal Savings Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan |
|
1400 Prospect Avenue Helena, MT 59601 |
|
|
163,909 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry A. Dreyer |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
53,859 |
(5) |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rick F. Hays |
|
Director |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Johnson |
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
66,195 |
(3)(5) |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lynn E. Dickey |
|
Director |
|
|
8,754 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Maierle |
|
Vice Chairman of the Board |
|
|
68,120 |
(4) |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. McCarvel |
|
Director |
|
|
34,140 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maureen J. Rude |
|
Director |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Evans |
|
Senior Vice President/Chief Information Officer |
|
|
25,382 |
(5) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael C. Mundt |
|
Senior Vice President/Chief Lending Officer |
|
|
38,204 |
(3)(5) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinton J. Morrison |
|
Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
8,199 |
(3)(5) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rachel R. Amdahl |
|
Senior Vice President/Operations |
|
|
19,910 |
(3)(5)(6) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (11 persons) |
|
N/A |
|
|
329,853 |
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
Summary
Eagle is a cheap bank with benign credit, trading at 88% of tangible book and 9-9.5x a conservative normalized earnings estimate. Management is conservative as exemplified by their loan provisioning and loss history. The three year anniversary of their second step occurs in April of this year which means they are eligible to be acquired, and have enough skin in the game to think this is a feasible outcome. While we have no reason to believe this will occur, we are of the view that the industry will continue to consolidate and clean banks in healthy geographies (with franchise scarcity value) will be targets. In such a scenario we believe that a 4% deposit premium isn’t unrealistic. As such, factoring in the earnings growth above, we’d expect a deal to occur in the $18-20 range.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position EAGLE BANCORP MONTANA INC?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea EAGLE BANCORP MONTANA INC for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".