2012 | 2013 | ||||||
Price: | 22.73 | EPS | $0.00 | $0.00 | |||
Shares Out. (in M): | 4,184 | P/E | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
Market Cap (in $M): | 69,421 | P/FCF | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
Net Debt (in $M): | 0 | EBIT | 0 | 0 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 0 | TEV/EBIT | 0.0x | 0.0x | |||
Borrow Cost: | NA |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
How many times in investing are we given the opportunity to capitalize on a theme that has just played out in fantastic fashion?
Shorting Australian real estate is just that opportunity. Given the recent experiences in the US, Ireland, Spain, the UK (& soon to be Canada), Australia is on course to match, or even exceed, most of those housing declines.
We spent one week last summer in Australia where we met representatives of the RBA, notable housing bulls and bears, as well as real estate agents from Melbourne to the Gold Coast. We even posed as potential home buyers and witnessed an (unsuccessful) auction.
We came away more confident that the average Australian homeowner was way over-levered and in denial of the pending doom. There was a certain kind of arrogance from many of the bulls (Christopher Joye being the most arrogant of the bunch). The bulls claimed to be keenly aware of the American experience and did their best to sell us their version of “it’s different over here”.
In our opinion, house prices are a function of credit growth and psychology. When both are positive, prices go up. When price growth outpaces income growth, you have a problem. When homeownership becomes a national obsession, you have a problem. To get a better understanding of the roll of credit and housing, go to Professor Steve Keen’s blog, http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/
One of the main papers (The Financial Review) came out with an article a week or two ago titled, “The Slow Death of Housing”. Plenty of interesting stuff in the article but one quote caught my attention. “Conversation at the dinner table has turned from ‘how big is your home to how small your mortgage is’”. The psychology has finally turned bearish. Up until late last year, 8 out of 10 articles or news programs was bullish on housing, now 8 out of 10 are bearish.
Primer on Australian Housing:
Myths:
Another great resource, other than Professor Keen, are the guys over at http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/. They’re sharp guys. It seems that the bears always do better homework.
Two arrows in the quiver:
There are really only two ways the government can deal with a housing correction. One is via monetary policy (the RBA has an inflation target range of 2 to 3%. Inflation is believed to be running well below 2% currently, leaving them plenty of wiggle room to reduce rates). Also, see http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2012/04/here-come-the-rate-cuts/
The other is fiscal policy. Australia is in control of their own currency and they have a total Debt to GDP of under 30% (don’t quote me exactly here). They have plenty of room bail out the banks and drop interest rates. You can short interest rates by buying a receiver swaption (tie it to the 5 year or 10 year Australian Gov’ Bond).
You can short the banks (or buy CDSs on them). We have avoided CDS due to the government’s ability (and high likelihood) to save the banks. The big 4 are ANZ, Commonwealth, Westpac, and NAB. Collectively, they are 80% of the mortgage market and 50% to 60% of their assets are tied to residential mortgages. At more than 2 x tangible book, the odds of the banks going up another turn of book is possible, but unlikely. They pay dividends, so your carry is negative.
In the face of the global financial crisis (they all refer to it down there as the “GFC”) the RBA dropped the OCR to 3% and the government initiated the first of two first time home buyers credit programs that stopped the house price declines. As the world began to recover from the depths of 2009, Australian housing resumed its trajectory. If you look at the price trends, supply of homes, velocity of sales, loan approvals etc. now versus 2009, one could argue that it’s finally the end game. Home sales are back to 1996 levels. Rates will likely go much lower than 3%. Owning receiver swaptions with a strike of 3.5% and having the OCR go to 1% would be an absolute home run. It is difficult to give you an exact quote on them given they vary significantly between banks. Ideally, one would shop among the big dealers.
Valuing these swaptions on a monthly basis can be aggravating. It’s driven by the demand for hedging. Lower vol = lower values when out of the money. If rates don’t come down fast enough, the duration of your trade becomes very important.
Many of the ratios look great now. For example, Westpac’s impairment charges on loans written off to average loans (%) are still low (.38) but they are more than double 2007. Westpac’s total housing related loans as a percentage of total loans are 50% (351 billion AUD) and loan loss reserves are less than 5 billion. Equity as a percentage of total assets are 6.5% and as a percentage of housing related loans it is less than 12%. A real correction can play havoc with their loan loss provisions, delinquency rates etc as well as their earnings power.
The banks are also more reliant now on offshore funding than ever before. Offshore funding stands at more than 30% of total deposits, more than double the level in 2000. Household deposits as a percentage of total bank deposits are almost 50% lower than 2000 (down to 22% or so from 35 to 40%).
Net margins have also been marching lower. They’re around 2.2%, down from north of 3%, despite a rising housing market and mining boom. Offshore funding is inherently more expensive and likely a little more ephemeral than domestic savings.
The bulls made a point of showing us charts comparing the housing related ratios of US banks to the Australian banks. In our opinion, the comparison is flawed because it assumes both countries are in the exact same house cycle (or secular trend). When the correction begins in earnest, we will be able to compare the housing cycles and we’ll likely find an eerily similar relationship between the US and Australia.
Risks:
We think the main risk is time. We’re convinced housing will crash but they always take longer than you initially think. We remember thinking housing was getting crazy in the US in 2002. It took another 4 years to crack, and even after the initial crack, it took another couple of years for the banks to collapse. In the case of Australia, house prices cracked during the GFC. They rebounded when the RBA dropped rates and the Government initiated the First Time Home Buyers Tax Credit. Those were only temporary stop gaps, on what we think is a secular retreat.
The banks have the implicit backing of the government. Yes, the banks could survive, but given what happened here, the banks would be trading at a fraction of book value.
Biggest risk is that China will continue to purchase Australian commodities in substantial quantities and the secular commodity bull market will continue and Australia’s mining riches prop up the faltering retail and housing industries. Even with that the housing bubble could collapse of its own weight.
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position Australian Housing?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea Australian Housing for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".