Description
Before outlining the fairly simple case for AMTG as a buy I
need to talk about the backdrop in the mortgage REIT sector in general. At the highest level, I firmly believe that
the mortgage REIT sector provides several very compelling opportunities at
present given a steep yield curve, accommodating monetary policy, cheap
non-agency assets available to the hybrid players like TWO, MFA and IVR and
valuations generally at or just below book with mid- to high-teens dividend
yields . The yields are achieved with
modest (based on historical levels) leverage of 7x debt/equity on average for
the agency players like NLY, AGNC, ANH,
CYS and HTS which use more leverage than their hybrid peers who can’t typically
lever the legacy non-agency paper. The
sector is in tumult right now (check out the Friday morning flash crashes in
most of the names) due to concerns about the debt ceiling and potential
downgrade affecting both the pricing of the underlying RMBS assets as well as the
availability of cheap repo financing.
Underlying RMBS pricing has held relatively firm for agency paper and
has stabilized in the non-agency sector following a selloff in June
precipitated by the Fed’s botched attempt at selling the Maiden Lane II portfolio
of old AIG RMBS bonds.
As far as the prospects for a big selloff following a
potential downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, there are lots of ways to look
at this but I will point out that as far as agency paper goes, RMBS should
arguably strengthen relative to Treasuries given that there is hard collateral
backing the obligations while Treasuries are only backed by the full faith and
credit of Uncle Sam. Non-agency RMBS paper is already either junk or non-rated
so a downgrade is irrelevant. As far as
repo financing, which is more relevant for the pure agency players, there are
no indications that anything exciting is going on at repo desks. All of the major agency REITs hold sufficient
excess collateral to withstand increases in the haircut more than 2x what
occurred following the failure of Lehman.
If rates went from 5% to 7% (much higher than they were following
Lehman) then the maximum leverage available on good agency RMBS collateral
would be 14x which is 5 turns higher than the highest levered agency
m-REIT. Basically the curve is steep
enough and the paper offering a wide enough spread to the swap curve (unlevered
asset return) that these guys don’t need to run with the higher levels of
leverage that used to be needed to generate a outsized return.
AMTG is really a special situation within the mortgage REIT
universe and may be attractive even to those who are agnostic or undecided with
respect to the bullish case for m-REITs as a group. The company completed its IPO on the NYSE on
July 22nd, selling 10 million shares at $20 each for $200 million of gross
proceeds. The green shoe has yet to be
exercised and likely won’t be given the turmoil in the sector that has stranded
several deals that were at various advance stages (mostly notably Orchid which
couldn’t get a deal done despite a big cut in pricing). Given the flood of deals in the space, Apollo,
the manager of AMTG, covered the underwriting commissions to make pricing
implicitly more attractive. That left
about $2 million of deal expenses and
other front-end costs to be absorbed by the IPO proceeds. This equates to book value per share at
$19.80. Incidentally, if the shoe is exercised it should take pro-forma book
value per share up a few pennies to $19.83.
This deal almost didn’t get done, had a large retail component (retail
is hugely influential in the mortgage REIT space given its appeal to income
oriented investors) and has gotten pummeled in its first week of trading. It closed at $18.02 on Friday, a 9% discount
to book value.
AMTG will eventually deploy a hybrid strategy, investing in
both agency and non-agency RMBS and is led by CEO Mike Commaroto, who has 25
years of experience in this market. They
stated that they are likely to build the agency book first and then eventually
settle out at 60 to 70% non-agency on an unlevered / portfolio level
basis. Given that the IPO just closed
AMTG is likely still in cash, though they could have been buying agency RMBS on
a forward settlement basis. Regardless
of the mix of cash, agency RMBS or perhaps some opportunistically purchased
non-agency paper, clearly this is a clean portfolio with good price discovery
that shouldn’t be trading at such a big discount. AMTG estimates that by the end of the year,
the portfolio will be fully deployed and earning 14 to 16% yields, which is
about average for the hybrid players.
This is on the basis of book value and doesn’t incorporate the
discount.
So, there is some
total return drag from owning AMTG while it ramps up the portfolio versus say TWO
or IVR which is already sporting a mid to high teens dividend yield. However, there is also no real downside
(other than another flash crash that produces a mark-to-market loss) given that we are at a material
discount to book already. The fees are
competitive, particularly given the small market cap, at 1.5% of stockholder
equity with no incentive fee. In
addition, one of the nice things about the current turmoil in the mortgage REIT
market is that it will be more difficult for smaller players to get secondary
offerings done which, if history is any guide, will mean that we may see some
of the better managed m-REITs trade at premiums to book value, pushing the
dividend yields down to more reasonable levels. I am not banking on this and in
fact would be happy to participate in AMTG deals as long as they are priced
above book value (accretive) and the environment is still attractive (some
combination of cheap assets and a steep curve).
Another way at looking at comparing the risk/reward of AMTG
versus say TWO or IVR is that if IVR or TWO get to 1.05 or more of their book
values, they will DEFINITELY come back to market with a deal priced 3 to 5%
below the close so that they deploy more capital in what they see as a target
rich environment (and generate more fees of course). AMTG would have to rally 10% just to get to
book value and I can’t see Apollo trying
to push a deal through to grow this thing at a discount to book. They will have to be patient, generate good
yields for a while and earn the right to become greedy pigs like TWO and IVR
and become serial issuers.
So to summarize, upside would be that this trades to book
value (up 9%) and then the bullish m-REIT thesis briefly summarized herein
persists, meaning mid to high teens returns net of fees. Downside is limited for now given that they
just closed on the IPO and started putting this capital to work. Once the book clipping along as a mix of
levered agency RMBS and unlevered non-agency RMBS, it will have the same
downside risks as the other names: Fed aggressively raises rates, housing
collapses again and non-agency prices tank, the next crisis is worse than 2008
and repo lines really are pulled from the agency RMBS book this time,
pre-payment speeds pick up and hurt agency RMBS, etc, etc.
Catalyst
- sector calms down and AMTG trades back to book value
- two quarters from now AMTG starts payout out dividends (if current rate, asset prices and repo rates hold) of $3.00 annualized
- better analysts in the space (who are very influential given that there is a lot to keep track of) like JMP and Barclays pick up coverage