• If we look at specific segments, we find varying degrees of concentration. In high-speed trains, Alstom has a market share of about 50% in Europe but less than 10% worldwide due to China’s domination by CRRC. While some countries like China, Germany and France typically award tenders to their national champions, outside of these home markets competition is fierce, and a merger between Siemens and Alstom will not change this.
• The regional train sector shows similar patterns, but competition is opening up and there are some strong players. Despite high market concentration in countries like Germany, Belgium and France, because there are such formidable competitors including Bombardier, Stadler and Hitachi, EC remedies will likely be limited.
• The market for railway signaling systems, which are designed to control the railway traffic and to guarantee the safe operation of trains on the railway network, is largely national, with high barriers to entry, although trends towards higher standardization may change this. The merger with Siemens and Alstom will create a formidable European player with at least a 40% market share in some countries, but with strong competitors like Thales, Bombardier and Hitachi, there are likely some logical remedies.
Synergies:
• Management of both Siemens and Alstom have set a target for cost synergies of a pre-tax run rate of € 470 million (3% of combined revenues) to be achieved within 4 years post deal closing. The group is expected to have double digit EBIT margins by 2020 (vs 8.0% pro forma).
• Potential sources of cost synergies, other than reduction of personnel include
- Procurement savings: raw materials (especially steel and aluminium), as well as various components, are likely to be a significant proportion of costs within the rolling stock business. The number of suppliers in a large number of areas can be pruned, which should result in supply chain savings.
- Scale benefits in SG&A costs: the combined organization can achieve economies of scale in functional and operational areas. In particular, pre bid processes for large contracts need not be duplicated.
- Product development costs: Future product development costs for the combined entity (for example for next generation high speed rail development) are likely to be significantly reduced as the two companies pool their R&D resources.
- Reduction in capex needs: One reason the capital intensity of the rail business is high is because customers (typically national rail operators) have local content
requirements for suppliers. Together, the two companies have complementary presence across markets. Alstom is strong in Africa, India, Middle East and South
America while Siemens is stronger in China, Europe and the United States.
Valuation:
Siemens Alstom pro forma for the merger trades at a FY18E EV/EBITA of 9.2X if you include just € 150 million of synergies (out of the € 470 million expected by year 4 post deal). We think these synergies are quite attainable and the margin enhancement beyond FY18 is likely underestimated by the Street. As such we think the stock should at a minimum trade at the MSCI Europe Capital Goods sector average of 11.0X. With EBITA of € 1.52 billion, net cash offset by unfunded pension and other off balance sheet liabilities, and 452 million shares outstanding, this equates to a post-dividend fair value of € 37 per share and pre-dividend fair value of € 45 per share, for upside of about 29%.
Alstom (ALO FP) Valuation Pro Forma |
Price per shareSi |
34.91 |
Shares Outstanding, fully diluted (mm) |
452 |
Equity market cap (€ mm) |
15,779 |
Less special dividends (€ mm) |
-1,800 |
Less net cash after exercise of GE puts (€ mm) |
-700 |
Plus unfunded pension, other off B/S liabs |
700 |
Enterprise Value (€ mm) |
13,979 |
FY18E PF Revenue |
16,700 |
FY18E PF EBITA pre-synergies |
1,370 |
FY18E PF EBITA margin pre-synergies |
8.2% |
FY18E PF EBITA post-synergies (discounted) |
1,520 |
FY18E PF EBITA margin pre-synergies |
9.1% |
EV/EBITA (FY18E pre-synergies) |
10.2X |
EV/EBITA (FY18E post-synergies) |
9.2X |