2024 | 2025 | ||||||
Price: | 20.50 | EPS | 1.57 | 2.01 | |||
Shares Out. (in M): | 67 | P/E | 8.5x | 6.7x | |||
Market Cap (in $M): | 1,376 | P/FCF | NM | NM | |||
Net Debt (in $M): | 0 | EBIT | 115 | 161 | |||
TEV (in $M): | 1,304 | TEV/EBIT | 9.3x | 6.6x |
Sign up for free guest access to view investment idea with a 45 days delay.
Note: We drafted this write up last week before the news of Chinese stimulus so the share price in the write up is $17 per share while the current price is $20 per share. Please assume the share price is $20 per share throughout the write up.
We think ACMR is a long with 100-300% upside and relatively limited downside over the long term. The company is (a) under-followed (never written up on VIC before), (b) cheap (single digit earnings multiple), (c) rapidly growing (+20% top line growth for years to come), (d) well-capitalized (net cash balance sheet), (e) owner-operated (founding CEO is the largest shareholder) and (f) has an attractive potential catalyst in the monetization of its publicly traded subsidiary is is valued at 2x its market cap. That being said, let us be clear: this is NOT a widow-and-orphans stock. This is a highly volatile, unusual U.S. based company with semiconductor capital equipment manufacturing assets in China. Please see the appendix for the risks related to the US-China geopolitical tensions related to the semiconductor industry.
We believe that ACM Research (ACMR) is a very attractive long-term investment with the potential to be a multi-bagger due primarily to (a) it being a significant beneficiary of Chinese domestic substitution in the wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) market and (2) a nascent international business opportunity that you are not paying for but could be very valuable if management executes. We think the downside is rather limited but the upside could be 100% to 300% over time with an incentivized US-based management team, a healthy balance sheet and normalized multiples that are double or triple the current US listing valuation (including the company’s own Shanghai subsidiary)
The tenets of our investment thesis are:
******************
China WFE market is in the early innings of its shift to “domestic substitution”
China has set out to replace its reliance on foreign semiconductor capital equipment vendors with home-grown national champions
The result is that China – through public, quasi-public and private foundries – has been spending an enormous amount of money on building their own national versions of Lam Research, Applied Materials, Tokyo Electron and others. For that reason, the revenue growth in China for these global peers has been close to zero while the growth rates of Chinese competitors is 30%, 40% or greater:
Currently, there is enormous concern and controversy about what future China WFE spending is – and whether it stays at or above the current $35 - $40 billion level or not. Some analysts (Bernstein) are relatively optimistic, while others (Needham) are pessimistic, but the important thing in our analysis is that we believe that ACMR (and its Chinese peers) can grow even if there is a sharp decline in the overall China WFE market because of the greater importance in market share gains that will likely accrue to them:
Some excerpts from various sell-side reports on the China WFE market:
Needham:
While we acknowledge that we have no way of knowing whether China WFE grows or shrinks and by how much in 2025, we believe that the long-term outcome is clear that China wants self-sufficiency in semiconductor manufacturing and that $30 or $40 billion is largely nothing compared to China’s national and economic strategic interests. History has taught us that many nations (including the US, Japan, many European nations, Korea and Taiwan) are willing to spend extraordinary sums to develop domestic capacity in this increasingly important industry, and with indirect means (subsidies, nudges, directed defense spend, etc). The recently-popular book Chip Wars provides a quick chronicle of this history, which we think is rhyming in China today.
It is also important to note that if China is serious about its self-suffiency aspiration in a reasonable time horizon, it needs to keep WFE investment up or risk an accumulating deficit of needed spend in the future. An examination of mature-logic below illustrates this below:
Company’s ambitious long term targets may be credible and would results in multi-bagger upside for stock
While we are not downplaying the importance of near-term China WFE trends, we think that there company’s long-term potential could yield to truly incredible results.
In 2022, the company introduced its first set of long-term financials targets, with a long term goal of $1 billion when it’s current revenues were $385 million:
Even though this was quite ambitious at the time, the company is on track to reach $1 billion in revenues likely by early 2026.
In 2Q24, the company updated their long term targets with an even more ambitious target of $3.0 billion in revenues, with $1.5 billion from China and $1.5 billion from the rest of the world.
*IF* (and it’s still a big IF) ACMR can get anywhere close to these targets, then the potential upside could be based on $3 to $6 per share in earnings with the right multiples being 20x to 30x, in line global platform peers like Lam Research and Applied Materials:
Delaware corporate structure is far less risky than typical VIE (even if some VIE’s have been able to recently repatriate cash)
While many investors may shudder at the mention of a US listed company with semiconductor operations in China and at the heart of the current US – China trade tension, we think that ACM Research’s corporate structure is as favorable as possible to US shareholders. Unlike most other Chinese technology stocks, ACMR is NOT a variable interest entity (VIE) but a Delaware incorporated company with direct ownership of its Chinese assets. We are not suggesting that there is no geopolitical or corporate risk to ACMR, but we think that if investors can take the time to get passed the headline risk, the corporate structure is actually rather protective for US shareholders. We also note that the founder is US based, the company is California headquartered, and the insiders own US-listed shares.
Management is incentivized and has executed well to date with attractive proxy compensation milestones
Likewise, unlike many Chinese stocks or ADRs, the management and board here own the same US-listed shares as we do. Founder David Wang has been the long-time CEO and chairman and is the largest shareholder. His stake of roughly 8 million shares (the proxy statement double counts the Class B as Class A too) is worth more than $140 million, which is a considerable sum relative to his $400k salary and bonus.
CEO Wang has been granted stock and options in the past, including 2023, but some earlier options (2020) have performance based milestones that are favorable to all shareholders, specifically stock price targets of $40 and $55 per share:
Option was granted on March 20, 2020. An initial 545,397 shares vested and became exercisable on August 5, 2020, which was the first trading day as of which the Issuer’s market capitalization equaled or exceeded $1,553,383,586. The remaining shares will vest and become exercise in two equal installments upon the first trading days, if any, on which the Issuer’s market capitalization equals or exceeds $2,553,383,586 and $3,553,383,586, respectively.
Normalized valuation multiple is double or triple the current US listing valuation – as evidenced by the company’s Shanghai listing
A quick glance of the Chinese (and global peers) shows that ACMR’s valuation is wildly discounted: Chinese peers trade at 30-40x earnings and US/Global peers trade at 20x or greater with significantly lower growth rates, while having significant exposure to the Chinese WFE market. The valuation of ACMR relative to any of these peers is clearly an outlier:
An even more bizarre comparison is the value of ACMR (US) and its Chinese listed subsidiary – ACM Research Shanghai (ticker 688082 in China). ACMR US owns 82% of ACMR Shanghai and ACMR Shanghai represents the overwhelming portion of ACMR US’s value and operations . . . yet ACMR Shanghai trades at 29x earnings and ACMR US trades at 9x! We note that ACMR Shanghai's valuation is not an outlier amongst Chinese-listed peers like Naura, AMEC and Piotech.
Of course, there are important differences in legal, country, regulatory and other risks, but from a fundamental business perspective, this is literally the same company.
We do not believe that a large-scale monetization of ACMR Shanghai is likely but the valuation gap here is so large that even a small monetization of the Shanghai interest could move the needle and with the aligned incentives of insiders, we believe it would be done in a manner that creates value for all US shareholders. We note that the Shanghai listed share lockup for ACMR parent expires in early 2025.
Rebuttal to short seller report provides a fine-toothed-comb dissection of many of the risks in the investment
In October 2020, there was a short report (https://www.jcapitalresearch.com/acmr.html) that was published on ACM Research with many serious allegations. Instead of the typical company response of a one-paragraph blanket denial, ACM Research issued a 112 page response (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1680062/000114036120028466/brhc10017901_ex99-01.htm) that calmly went through every detail with a fine-toothed comb, pointing out where there were factual mistakes in the short report (like miscalculating peer net margin when trying to compare company gross margins) or clarifications that nullify the claims made (a “related party” supplier was actually arms-length and has been a highly profitable investment for the company). Some concerns and skepticism around the company's prospects were correct and warranted at the time, but have been allayed by ACMR's traction and sales cadence domestically and internationally.
Regardless, the comprehensiveness of the company’s response has afforded us some additional comfort, given how attentive we are to the warnings from many activist short selling research reports.
Conclusion:
We believe that ACMR has several potential outcomes, with a wide range of possibilities:
Appendix
Customer Concentration
Select Chinese “Blacklist” / Entity List excerpts
CXMT Blacklist Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-09/us-mulls-blacklisting-cxmt-to-further-curb-china-s-chip-advance
ACM has been operating under this environment for more than 3 years and seems to have navigated it well.
Disclaimer: I, my firm, or my firm’s clients may have a position (long or short) in the securities discussed herein and may change such position without further notice. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
- Continued growth in revenues and earnings
- Expansion of US and non-China Rest of World business, which would lead to significant multiple expansion
- Potential monetization of ACM Research Shanghai stake
- Increasing US investor awareness of stock
show sort by |
Are you sure you want to close this position ACM RESEARCH INC?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea ACM RESEARCH INC for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are 1 way you can get the privilage.
Apply for or reactivate your full membership
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.
What is wrong with message, "".